WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

617
Let’s say a health mandate was completely unavoidable, but you had a choice in what that mandate was. What would a benevolent government that actually cares about its people mandate to fight back against a virus that supposedly kills fatties and elderly people?

Let’s say a health mandate was completely unavoidable, but you had a choice in what that mandate was.

What would a benevolent government that actually cares about its people mandate to fight back against a virus that supposedly kills fatties and elderly people?

1 hour of daily exercise.
Limit/ban access to junk/fast food.
Weekly fasting.
A mix of all of the above.
Send fat people to camps, lol.
Experimental mRNA gene therapy juice.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Just to play nice for your poll, I'd send fat people to camps. Simple enough, it's a single mandate that only affects people who are the problem. That's easily the most fair option. Maybe give the people in the camps the experimental drugs, too. Why not, you've already violated their human rights.

But, I hate these kind of hypotheticals. They limit options, options like "Fuck You!", or, "Send anyone who obeys the mandates to the camps.", or, "Shoot the person enforcing the mandate in the face."

[–] 2 pts

I can see where you’re coming from, but the idea here is you’d be the leader and you’d HAVE to make the call. So I guess you shooting yourself would be an optional answer.

Interesting to see the results so far, though. Looks like I’m a bad person for wanting to enforce daily exercise.

Ohhh, I thought you were saying we got to vote for which mandate we wanted a dictator to pass down to us. So, I'm the dictator here? Ooooh, I could have fun with that, haha.

I'm all about the top three answers, BUT, I think sending the fat people to camps kind of handles the problem on it's own. If you're not fat, you're probably doing one or more of the healthy options.