I've explored Q plenty. I found it to be a LARP.
I'm not sure you have. I know of no other LARP in the sense most are familiar with in modern nomenclature, which has existed for just about four years. Maybe if we change the definition we can qualify it against other "LARP", but that feels like a stretch.
How has Q been more beneficial than not?
I have a feeling you're just walking me in to a trap, but I've explained this in great detail and many times. The essence of the operation was to organize gifted people, recruit some of them and get the rest and others like them to coordinate an information campaign. The genesis dealt mostly with military intelligence. There are many "good guys" in all sorts of places but they realize they have things to lose, like their ability to reach a wider audience. As such, like with Peterson not going down the JQ path to save his ability to reach demoralized young men, some chose not to step in to the limelight and instead instigate a psychological operation to involve as many as possible to coordinate the organization, analysis and diffusion of information. They did this by making use of an already deployed network of individuals all across the world, all "members" of which have no name, no face, no central authority or governing body, who can't be silenced, who fear no evil and who keep popping up like Hydra itself.
There will come a time when you will be offered the opportunity to better understand. I can't say what it will look like. I can't say how long it will take. These aren't things I would know. What I do know, however, is that the choice will be yours (even if I disagree to an extent).
People LARP until the game ends. You guys keep playing...so the game hasn't ended.
It's not a trap. I'm challenging you to do a cost/benefit analysis on Q. Has the Q movement been more beneficial, or more damaging, to the right-leaning movement as a whole? I say it has been more damaging, because I can point to the MSM using it to disparage anyone who could even be loosely associated with the Q movement. Every protest that has overt Q followers(people with Q shirts, posterboards, etc.) has its legitimacy immediately diminished.
I see no objective benefit. No desirable outcomes. The state of the country is 20x worse than when Q first emerged. I'm not blaming that on Q. I'm just saying, Q has helped the left, more than it has helped the right.
As far as there coming a time for me to understand...understand what? I'm not a leftist. I'm not on the fence about the dangers of CRT, or the vaxx, or the election, or the Great Reset. I'm not in the dark here dude...I'm just saying Q was worse than useless. Q was damaging, and continues to be. Let it die. Let the MSM look like idiots for continuing to talk about it long after its dead.
Seriously, that last paragraph of yours, sounds like something an evangelical Christian would say to a non-believer. "You'll understand one day, and we'll be here for you when you do." It's weird as shit.
It's okay that we fundamentally disagree. I think it might make sense in your position to question yourself about whether or not these thoughts are the product of demoralization or not.
No, my skepticism comes from being rational and logical, and unwilling to believe something just because it's an attractive thing to believe. Really, I wish Q were real. I wish McAfee's poison pill was real. I tried, I really did. The evidence was just lacking.
This isn't going anywhere, but you didn't resort to overt insults, so I'll give you that. And an upvote for good measure. Have a good one man.
(post is archived)