Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

337
  1. Q gave people hope! How powerfull is that
  2. Q was against the pedophile elite
  3. Q was right about the election being stolen
  4. Q was opening people's eyes especially the boomers

The big point is that Q gave hope it was on thr right side of almost every argument it was against the democommies and what replaced it? Nothing no movement nothing and all we get is these people pretending to be in the right side of things demonizing everything Q stood for

1. Q gave people hope! How powerfull is that 2. Q was against the pedophile elite 3. Q was right about the election being stolen 4. Q was opening people's eyes especially the boomers The big point is that Q gave hope it was on thr right side of almost every argument it was against the democommies and what replaced it? Nothing no movement nothing and all we get is these people pretending to be in the right side of things demonizing everything Q stood for

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (222).
[–] • 0 pt

Before all this started they had few followers. They even had Hillary's campaign manager admit they've been rigging elections for 50 years and no one heard that. And that was with them rising during Trump's campaign.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

I get it, I really do. But my point still stands - hiding and playing coy CIA games didn't change anything. Snowden and Assange (just two examples) stood up and went public and did make something change.

I wish it were different, but that is just how I see it.

[–] • 0 pt

That's fine. How many countries have the CIA destroyed without firing a shot? CIA games control the world. It's information warfare. It's psyops.

Assange is unique. Snowden is CIA. Both are participating in information warfare.