WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

  1. Q gave people hope! How powerfull is that
  2. Q was against the pedophile elite
  3. Q was right about the election being stolen
  4. Q was opening people's eyes especially the boomers

The big point is that Q gave hope it was on thr right side of almost every argument it was against the democommies and what replaced it? Nothing no movement nothing and all we get is these people pretending to be in the right side of things demonizing everything Q stood for

1. Q gave people hope! How powerfull is that 2. Q was against the pedophile elite 3. Q was right about the election being stolen 4. Q was opening people's eyes especially the boomers The big point is that Q gave hope it was on thr right side of almost every argument it was against the democommies and what replaced it? Nothing no movement nothing and all we get is these people pretending to be in the right side of things demonizing everything Q stood for

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

I am an open, honest person. If this Q person(s) really had information that needed to be brought to light, then call up Project Veritas or Fox News or NewsMax or whatever and come out in the open. Just like Snowden or Assange. The fact that the Q person(s) kept hidden really turned me off the whole Q thing. The only path out of our problems is to stand up and be noticed. IMHO, hiding and playing pretend CIA games is not going to do anything.

[–] 0 pt

You mean contact a group everyone was already ignoring and MSM was spinning as fake and fraudulent and few had ever heard of?

Now that your theory is invalidated, what else ya got?

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

We are not enemies here dude, it's just my opinion.

And you didn't refute any of the points I made, so no invalidation occurred.

[–] 0 pt

Before all this started they had few followers. They even had Hillary's campaign manager admit they've been rigging elections for 50 years and no one heard that. And that was with them rising during Trump's campaign.

[–] 0 pt

Q was hiding

The entire idea is that compartmentalization is structured in a way that you cannot divulge confidential information without getting in loads of trouble or even killed. They weren't hiding. They were protecting the operation and operators. This is a very, very lacking argument and it displays your ignorance of how information systems are structured in the USA.

I just don't buy it. And even now when the election was STOLEN, they still hide. We are at war, and hiding behind some goofy excuse doesn't win the war. If they truly know the score, and they know information that can change things, then hiding and playing games DOESNT HELP.

[–] 0 pt

some goofy excuse

This is why we usually just mock you and call you retarded.

[–] 0 pt

Turned out pretty good for assange didn't it?

Only the commies promise utopia here on earth, and always fail to deliver. Doing the right thing will bring suffering sometimes. Anytime good faces off against evil, there will be suffering.