If Q was "containing" the energy, what would you have had those people do without Q? How would people have organized, been inspired or kept from being infiltrated or shut down while having discussions without Q? Did Q give us the "wrong kind of hope"? Is that it? What if Q is a psyop and the entire aim is to inject in to a small part of society at first the ability to organize in a decentralized manner, to coordinate disseminating information and to help ease people in ways that don't result in misguided assholes burning down things that everyone else shares with them? These are very, very lacking points of contention and I think you're arguing in bad faith here. Of course, I don't think it's your fault you're doing this. I think you'd just rather be with the crowd you think is right because you prefer to not have to suffer longer if the ones saying /ourguys/ are in control are right. The reality is justice moves very, very slowly. The good news is its force isn't able to be repelled once it manifests. Do you want a slow, lasting conversion, where there isn't as much room for the people pulling strings to escape, or do you want riots, burning infrastructure, briefly satisfying hangings and an eventual resurfacing of all of the things we hate? Do you know how many times we've burned everything to the ground and had to completely rebuild while the same kinds of people sat on the sidelines, laughed at us and resumed control soon after we got the societal operations back up and running again? I'll give you a hint: a fucking lot. I think what's really going on is you'd rather not stomach the pains of continuing to know while others around you don't see how bad things really are. I think you've given in to demoralization and you blame more problems than necessary on other people. I think you're scared of what might happen if other people don't realize what's wrong sooner than you'd prefer. I'd like to remind you that some people have been fully aware of deeper depravities than you're familiar with for longer than you've been alive. I also think it's pertinent that you understand that there are indeed people who are much more intelligent, capable and determined than you (me included, so don't get me wrong) who are making active and intricate maneuvers to enact justice and bring about meaningful change. Of course, you're free to believe there aren't any good guys. But, if that's the case, I don't see why you don't just relent because, if that's the case, you're going to be miserable and ultimately die in agony anyway. Why not just get it over with? These might be good arguments for normalfags, but to someone that doesn't just scroll /pol/ and reddit alternatives, it's always clear when you're interacting with someone who has a very limited view and is pretty much only capable of echoing what other people with silver tongues and finely crafted talking points have designed.