WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

566

An interesting way to remove experienced skilled white healthcare professionals from a well paid job with benefits...replace them with coloreds and brownies. Flips the socioeconomic paradigm, disenfranchises whites and redistributes wealth.

An interesting way to remove experienced skilled white healthcare professionals from a well paid job with benefits...replace them with coloreds and brownies. Flips the socioeconomic paradigm, disenfranchises whites and redistributes wealth.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

That's what I figured. I filed both but figure only the religious one will be approved. I'm sure they can find reasons to argue a medical one. The lawyer said if they deny the religious one for either one of us, he will help us appeal and we assume a lawyer would be enough to scare them into accepting.

It does kind of sound like we will be thrown on a 'to be replaced with offshore' list, though. This is all insane. No one has the right to demand I take any kind of medical treatment.

[–] 0 pt

Yep, thr medical exemption is probably a lotbharder to argue since it kind of requires a doctor to vouch for it. And it has to be renewed regularly. Religious exemption is forever. It might actually make it less likely to get your job offshored. If they singled you out, you could legally argue that it was discrimination based on religion. I honestly think that's a big part of the reason that HR departments really don't want to grant religious exemptions. It makes them do extra work before firing someone in order to avoid lawsuits.