Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.2K

I see a couple quotes that are good.

Jews are synagogue of satin Faggots are bad don't lay with your brother

So out of a giant book what percentage is good advice?

So the king James Bible has

The King James Authorized Bible has 783,137 words

And let's say 100 say shit about the jews?

And 100 say your body is a temple aka work out

And how much of the Bible warns of about niggers?

And how much of the Bible wars us about race mixing?

So out of 750k words of the greatest book ever written claimed by jew loving christ cucks how much is actual good advice for the white race?

I'm being generous when I say 100 words warning about faggots?

Seems like a lot of words wasted when it could be broken down real easy..

Keep your body healthy and be moral and never let jews or niggers in you nation.

There ya go the 16 words that could have saved the white race

I see a couple quotes that are good. Jews are synagogue of satin Faggots are bad don't lay with your brother So out of a giant book what percentage is good advice? So the king James Bible has The King James Authorized Bible has 783,137 words And let's say 100 say shit about the jews? And 100 say your body is a temple aka work out And how much of the Bible warns of about niggers? And how much of the Bible wars us about race mixing? So out of 750k words of the greatest book ever written claimed by jew loving christ cucks how much is actual good advice for the white race? I'm being generous when I say 100 words warning about faggots? Seems like a lot of words wasted when it could be broken down real easy.. Keep your body healthy and be moral and never let jews or niggers in you nation. There ya go the 16 words that could have saved the white race

(post is archived)

[–] • 8 pts

You've front loaded a lot of bullshit and jew propaganda into your questions.

First of all, Jews are the canaanites God commanded be genocided. They are the pharisees and the edomites. None of which are well regarded in the bible.

Secondly, the bible is actually a history book. Most of it simply documents events. It describes a ton of different peoples.

The Adamites only survived because Noah was still of pure blood. The offshoots which came later were also problematic because of foreign wives and so on. Much is said about your loaded questions. This alone clearly speaks to what's actually stated in the bible.

The fallacy of your questions is that you're asking about the bible and ignoring what churches actually teach. Most churches don't teach the whole bible or teach a Jewish revisionist perspective which directly contradicts the bible.

The bible isn't the problem. Corrupt churches and corrupt people who turn people away from the bible and our own history is the problem.

https://poal.co/s/Religion/428112

https://poal.co/c/df149354-cbd3-4319-81d5-7efd9479f751#cmnts

[–] • 1 pt

To add to your comment the Bible is relatable because it shows human nature.

[–] • 1 pt

To add to your comment the Bible is relatable because it shows human nature.

Agreed.

What so many seem to miss is this is the continuation of what's described in the bible. It never ended. Same peoples in eternal struggle.

[–] • -1 pt

I tried doing it as plain and simple as possible. A book of 750k words should have a ton of shit about niggers faggots and pedophiles and jews and how to keep them out of your society? The Japanese seem to be doing a lot better job then Christian nations...

The stuff you claim is their any solid way to prove any of it?

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

A book of 750k words should have a ton of shit about niggers faggots and pedophiles and jews and how to keep them out of your society? The Japanese seem to be doing a lot better job then Christian nations...

That's fallacious, you're saying a book ought to contain mostly rants about niggers and jews instead of what it is.
Do the Vedas scriptures reach your standard in the topics mentioned?

It records something like: God advises "don't do X," then the people do X, then a lot of horrific stuff happens to people as a consequence, then God saves them again because he mad a promise. So from that you can understand what not to do and why not to do it.

It doesn't outline what the definitive age of consent is or should be, but it does command no pre-marital sex, and it should be obvious to a conscientious, logical people that pre-pubescent children & and teens are not mature enough for all that anyway. There also might be an issue of varying maturity rates. "Fornication" & "sexual immorality" are terms that cover a lot of things.

It's not constructed like the Norse fables, where the story is fabricated primarily to teach a lesson to new generations, although it may seem like it from the elements within. Japanese have a lot of fables and some of them are about being very wary of outsiders, it's part of their culture, it's separate from Bhuddism, and not particularly part of Shinto. I'm not aware of any Japanese holy texts that can form a book.

The stuff you claim is their any solid way to prove any of it?

The Jews and Arabs, and therefore MENA in general, are proven to be descended from the populations native to Canaan/ Anatolia, which are divergent from Europeans.

[–] • 0 pt

That's fallacious, you're saying a book ought to contain mostly rants about niggers and jews instead of what it is.

No a book that long... wait the fucking book doesn't need to be that long for fuck sake.

But the book should have given plenty of warnings about jews faggots not staying physically fit tabbacco alchol etc..

No the entire fucking book shouldn't be rants about those topics but if you look at the main things destroying white western society it is jews faggots niggers drugs and alchol. The fucking Bible barely touches in these or if it does its like 2 or 3 quotes. Also throw out the old testament completely it's the jew Torah for fuck sake! When u throw that out even less is mentioned about jews and niggers and faggots.

[–] • 0 pt

It doesn't outline what the definitive age of consent is or should be, but it does command no pre-marital sex, and it should be obvious to a conscientious, logical people that pre-pubescent children & and teens are not mature enough for all that anyway. There also might be an issue of varying maturity rates. "Fornication" & "sexual immorality" are terms that cover a lot of things.

Tons of teens at the time period where having children up until the early 1900 14 year Olds in America where getting married and having children. The Bible is not very clear on this but obviously before a woman can have children that is fucking pedophilia any fwggots sexualizing children need to be put down it's that simple.

That was very antisemitic of me

[–] • 2 pts

Mein Kampf was pretty dull, but it's more relevant than the bible regarding modern society

All this christian guff about equality amongst men clearly didn't foresee the parasitical behaviour of niggers, just as welfare cultures only work properly when there are no Lefties or non Whites to exploit it.

The Amish were right, no nogs in their culture The Muslims were right, no fags in their culture The Christians are being taken for suckers and they are actively ruining the West

[–] • 0 pt

Well back then the concept of diversity being a strength was so fucking Ludacris it was hard to even think they would ever think that would become a thing. Kinda weird the jew kike God knew everything was all powerfull but left out some really really important things to make a society function. Every other page of the Bible should be about how evil and soulless the kikes are and that they are subhuman who not only have no empathy actually thrive on deceiving and tricking people out side of their degenerate race. Should have come down harder on pedophiles and faggots one in the same actually

[–] • 0 pt

Diversity of thinking can be useful, otherwise you end up as Switzerland, where nothing really happens. The obvious caveat should have been that thinking requires an IQ >80, and this eliminates every African

The Left do this a lot, they come up with an idea which they know is only ever going to be applicable to White nations, like welfare, and then they sneak in niggers who then fuck the whole thing up.

Yes, Islam had more direct dealings with the jew so they talk a lot more about the necessity of exterminating them. I guess that's way they migrated elsewhere, because they had been found out and were looking for naive cultures to subvert, like the West, post 1950's

The bible reflects the period, paedophiles only become a modern issue when men are denied marriage by feminism, before that period everyone just got married so there was no time for Leftist depravities. The same for fags, they are just men who have been brainwashed to try and emulate the new social power of women

Christianity has bought into the whole 'niggers are human' Leftist bullshit, this never used to be the case, they used to be acknowledged as savages until the jew took control. The church is an existential threat to the White race because it denies our innate superiority, the social values as applied to White people might have some crossover, but it's a mistake to ally with them until they expel the jew imo

[–] • 0 pt

>The Muslims were right, no fags in their culture

Plenty of fags among muslims

[–] • 0 pt

not quite, faggotry is banned under islam but boy rape is overlooked as it's not considered homosexual pederasty

It's the Western form of open faggoting that is corrosive to our culture and values, if the Left support something then that's how you know it is essentially destructive in nature

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

be moral

You have no clue what the Bible is about. The law wasn't given so that it could be kept; it was to show us the desperate spiritual need that we have. Jesus fulfilled the law, met the need for punishment by living a sinless life and dying for us, and then rose from the dead.

[–] • 0 pt

Washing prostitutes feet? Saying all men are equal? Perfect guy making tons of wine from water getting people drunk? Turning the cheek and giving unto ceasar? Not being totally clear about niggers and the problems they will create?

Ya man totally perfect. That being said Christian values and morals over all are solid. Weird how the Japanese can have a giant city like Tokyo and have almost zero crime and basically no murders almost as if thry have a more moral religion? Check out Christian brazil compared to pagen Japan where would u want to live

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Washing prostitutes (sic) feet?

vice versa. Like I said, you have no idea what the Bible is about.

Saying all men are equal?

Again, not in there.

Perfect guy makin tons of wine...

Yes, the wedding at Cana

... getting people drunk?

Did he? (no)

Turning the cheek and giving unto ceaser (sic)?

Yes.

Not being totally clear about niggers...

He is our racial peace, who broke down the dividing wall of hostility. See Ephesians chapter 2.

Christian values and morals over all are solid.

You don't get to have the values and morals of the Christ without being his sheep. Currently you speak as a goat, a son of the devil, destined for outer darkness, weeping, gnashing of teeth, etc.

Instead of comparing entire countries and trying to derive the veracity or value of their majority religion from crime stats, compare yourself to the perfect law of God. You are in rebellion and need a savior. You won't give a crap about Japan when you're in the lake of fire.

[–] • 0 pt

Ohhh I'm a goat and a bear I'm no fucking jew sheep waiting to be a slave for yahews choosen fucking people. I don't need disgusting sand nigger book to tell me what being a good human is it is part of our heritage as white Europeans living in high trust societies for thousands of years. We didn't need the book the book needed us the perfect tax cow and warrior for endless jew banker wars.

Thanks my new name is goatbear

[–] • 0 pt

You don't actually believe Jesus rose from the dead, do you? I mean, come on, honestly? Because dead people don't rise from their coffins, thank God. If Jesus was a human being, he lived like a human being and died like a human being.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Of course I believe that Jesus rose from the dead. Yes, in many ways he was like us (He had to be like his brothers [and sisters] in every way , so that he could become a merciful and high priest in matters pertaining to God).

My entire "faith" depends on the resurrection.

If Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless; you are still in your sins.

Dead people don't rise from their coffins.

Not repeatable --> not possible? I suppose that doesn't apply to our origins (i.e. where everything came from).

[–] • 0 pt

I repeatedly turn back to gen 3:16 whenever my wife gets mouthy

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

And how much of the Bible warns of about niggers?

If you include the apocrypha, and you identify Negroid race as "Hamite," then it says they will all perish here-

Testament of Simeon:

"BEHOLD I have told you all things, that I may be acquitted of your sin. 2 Now, if ye remove from you your envy and all stiff-neckedness, is a rose shall my bones flourish in Israel, and as a lily my flesh in Jacob, and my odour shall be as the odour of Libanus; and as cedars shall holy ones be multiplied from me forever, and their branches shall stretch afar off. 3 Then shall perish the seed of Canaan, and a remnant shall not be unto Amalek, and all the Cappadocians shall perish, and all Hittites shall be utterly destroyed. 4 Then shall fail the land of Ham, and all the people shall perish. 5 Then shall all the earth rest from trouble, and all the world under heaven from war. 6 Then the Mighty One of Israel shall glorify Shem. 7 For the Lord God shall appear on earth, and Himself save men,"

There's also some scriptures about Ethiopians, but it's not much.

And how much of the Bible wars us about race mixing?

Ignoring the "Adamic vs non-adamic" idea, because there are no passages discussing what should be one of the main focuses of the texts (Non-adamic peoples), if the idea was true: The creationist view: The main Racial Groups can only come from the three Progenitors & their wives (their wives would be the main source of genetic divergence between offspring, like two races having shared Neanderthal DNA and the other not). The belief is that in the beginning there was only one progenitor pair for each Kind (like "Family" rather than "Genus") of creature, which had within it the capacity for a greater variety of offspring than creatures do now, the different species and subspecies arose through that variance, and then selection pressures or preferences weed out certain genetic expressions, which leads to specialisations. Hence why inbreeding wasn't an issue like it is now. With each generation there would have been alleles lost, so there is an entropy to it. There would have been a lot more variance/ divergence between Genera before the flood, and the humans and animals that were were spared would have still been rather close, in generations, to the original pair.

Genesis 9:18-29 summary - ““Cursed is Kena‛an, let him become a servant of servants to his brothers.” - Which brothers? It must be his own father, Ham, as well as Japheth & Shem, because 'uncovering the nakedness of the father' is a euphemism used to describe incest - Leviticus 18:12-14/ 20:11-17 - Shem & offspring is blessed above the other progenitors, Japheth & his offspring are blessed under him, Ham is left without blessing or curse.

It forms a definitive, divinely-outlined Racial Caste System according to the consequences of the progenitor's actions/ attitudes. And you have to ask if a Shemite and a Canaanite mix, will their offspring receive the curses or the blessings?
Racial groups are specialised/ selected towards certain traits and hybridising them just means that you lose the specialisation, so if one group specialises for intellect & social ability where as another specialises for athletic ability & fuel-efficiency, the offspring has neither specialisation, or much weaker expressions of each at least. There is also a conflict of breeding habits, k-selection vs r-selection can be partly applied to human behaviour.

Deuteronomy 7:3 tells the Israelites not to intermarry with Canaanites (which they didn't obey.) Deu 7:6  “For you are a set-apart people to YHWH your Elohim. YHWH your Elohim has chosen you to be a people for Himself, a treasured possession above all the peoples on the face of the earth.

The entirety of Proverbs 5 is a warning against mixing with foreigners, and "foreigner" didn't really include other "Shemites," like Arameans (I don't mean the MENA populace of today). MENA are a racial mixture, the most frequent component being European & Native Canaanite. The fact that they had a word for describing 'racial mixtures' should tell you a lot, like how Indo-Europeans had words for milk produce. Jews are mostly Lactose Intolerant, yet the Bible contains references to milk as a staple of their diet, like it was for the Indo-European/ Yamnaya people. People make a racial distinction between Babylonian and Indo-European, but I remember reading a Babylonian record about the original founders of Babel migrating from the North, and looking like the people of Aratta (a rival empire to the north), plainly described as Blonde & Blue eyed, but after migrating to the Fertile Crescent, they mixed with the Dilmun migrants of the East, and lost their fairer appearance.

[–] • 0 pt

You do realize that the Old Testament is literally just copypasta from noses, right? It's just a bunch of shit pulled from "jews" detailing the "jewish" perspective. The New Testament is a story told from an entirely different perspective. Hell the last tribe of Israel is Aryans. I won't pretend there's no insight or wisdoms to be gleaned from the Bible, especially as a whole, but you must understand the true nature of both parts and how the conflict before you can take away much that's useful.

Besides, if you really want to save the white race, why aren't you having ten kids, homeschooling them, teaching them to provide for themselves and running for office to champion your politics? Look, I'm white and I like people like me. I want people like me to not die out too, but I understand I'm not a victim necessarily and that if I devote myself to it I can make my own situation much better. Blaming collectives and trying to pretend you're going to save people with similar genetics to you by just talking about it on the internet is pretty laughable. What are you doing personally to save the white race? Talking to feds on the internet about it? That's pretty much all anyone aims to accomplish, who can't stop obsessing long enough to fix problems in their own lives.

I'd be willing to be my whole portfolio on people that constantly chirp about the fourteen words, who's entire days are filled with being a fatass, drinking beer, getting no exercise, not reading any books, not doing deep research and not improving their financial positions outside of going to work, clocking in, pretending not to hate themselves, clocking out and going home and repeating it all again. When you're only complaining and doing next to nothing to fix problems you see, even if you're delusional or not, all you are is a grumbler. All you are is annoying and unfocused.

Now, I've liked our interactions plent of times before, man. But this seems like it's poorly thought out and sort of beneath you.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

You do realize that the Old Testament is literally just copypasta from noses, right?

That's true ONLY if you believe Jews. It's actually Hebrew history. Not Jewish history. Jews are not Tribe of Judah. That's why Jew was inserted into the KJV after the 1611 translation revision.

Ultimately you're declaring you believe revisionist Jews above all others. Cough.

To learn more: https://poal.co/s/AskPoal/447025/b9d77907-fba9-4621-a9ab-c783739231a8#cmnts

[–] • 1 pt

So the Old Testament "god" isn't El or his son Yahweh, right? They aren't Canaanite gods, right? Catholics don't have a big statue of Moloch outside of the Vatican, right?

Boy, you sure love you some semantics. Are you just going to follow me around and craft pilpul about semantics at anything you see me saying now?

[–] • 1 pt

Your pilpul and projection thereof doesn't change that I'm the only one here supporting their position with facts and historical evidence. Facts which mostly only anger Jews.

Follow the links and learn or continue to push Jewish revisionism. Now why might you want to push Jewish revisionism... rhetorical.

[–] • 0 pt

I finished reading it. I'm a little older so 10 kids is a problem but I do have a plan for that. I think I got a good white woman and can have two kids 3 if I got lucky with twins. But after my kids I think I will look to adopt white kids and help them maybe even foster parent but man that's a can of worms.

I already said it I have enjoyed your replys and probably post not sure what was beneath me but I'm sure you have your reasons to end on that note.

[–] • 0 pt

I think the main aim is to get people to build themselves up and resist displacing blame they don't need to delve out. I think if all of us focused on ourselves instead of the things prohibiting further growth and then came together when it's appropriate, it would make a great deal more sense to bolster what room is left for collective thought. As I always say, there's no room for collectivism while we're all slaves to an invasive regime governed by people that aren't like us, don't understand our plights or don't care about our betterment.

[–] • 0 pt

Besides, if you really want to save the white race, why aren't you having ten kids, homeschooling

I guess you have not seen my 5 things all white men need to be doing.

  1. Get in shape
  2. Get moral
  3. Get out of debt
  4. Get a white woman have kids
  5. Get land and off grid homestead.

When asap.. work out today start getting moral it will help with the next 3.

I am on my way very close to done need to sell a couple more condos and close on 5.1 acres ...

I sent this before finishing your reply. Which I liked enough to quick reply

[–] • 0 pt

Awesome. I think we're on the same page after all. Excuse me, fren.

[–] • 0 pt

Thomas Jefferson took the New Testament and cut out all the parts that didn't make any sense to him, parts he decided were mere folk tales and superstitions, such as the miracles of Jesus. The result was the Jefferson Bible, which I admit I've never actually examined. Maybe it's what you're looking for.

[–] • 0 pt

Is that the same Thomas Jefferson who has sex with his nigger slaves, fathered halfbreed nigger children, and then kept those children as slaves?

Not my idea of someone to orient my moral compass on.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

No, that's what leftists like to say to discredit him. At most his brother did the deed, but even that is questionable.

Edit: in case you haven't noticed, the liars started very early in American history.

[–] • 0 pt

Want to attempt to back up that claim?

Keep worshiping at the altar of powdered wig men.