WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

522

I currently live in CA.

I do NOT want my kids to get the shot.

If there are no exceptions, we are moving. Unfortunately home-schooling isn't an option for us (details on this would be too revealing for this forum).

First on our list of states is Texas for two main reasons: 1) We know some people there who can help us with the move and getting settled; 2) My wife's profession may allow her to work in Texas without any issues. Other options include Idaho and Arizona, but they may not meet our needs for other reasons.

HERE'S MY QUESTION:

If we leave CA for another state which is currently against jab mandates, will the federal gov't and the shitlibs push hard enough that states resisting the jab will cave?

This is obviously an enormous decision for us. I'm really asking for your views on this. Is this shit going to stop?

I currently live in CA. I do NOT want my kids to get the shot. If there are no exceptions, we are moving. Unfortunately home-schooling isn't an option for us (details on this would be too revealing for this forum). First on our list of states is Texas for two main reasons: 1) We know some people there who can help us with the move and getting settled; 2) My wife's profession may allow her to work in Texas without any issues. Other options include Idaho and Arizona, but they may not meet our needs for other reasons. HERE'S MY QUESTION: If we leave CA for another state which is currently against jab mandates, will the federal gov't and the shitlibs push hard enough that states resisting the jab will cave? This is obviously an enormous decision for us. I'm really asking for your views on this. Is this shit going to stop?

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

If it would do any good, I'd pick up a rifle. Doing what I realistically can do.

[–] 0 pt

Hmm.. School boards got FBI and Domestic Terrorism powers today..

Looks like they want a fight?

Can they really find enough jackboots with no issues forcing kids to get jabbed?

I doubt it.

[–] 0 pt

Very interesting take on this, that by getting the power to use jackboots, they're provoking a fight. Maybe someone could make a legal argument out of that and get it to go somewhere. Could turn some of the tables on their operation.

Alas, I doubt they're looking for a fight. I think they just want compliance.

Could they find enough jackboots if things came to a shooting match? At first, yes. But then very quickly, no. That's why they want the total compliance.