You’re gonna have a rough time convincing a crowd of unarmed people to attack a bunch of guys with guns. Like sure, if 200 people attack 20 officers, at least 100 will survive. But each individual person is going to look at it as there’s a 50% chance they are going to die.
It’s an equally unlikely scenario just for different reasons, and even if it ever does happen, it can only happen so many times before you aren’t dealing with 20 officers but thousands of soldiers. With much bigger and faster guns
The point I am making is that if people are truly desperate, they will end up weighing up those odds and ultimately conclude that its worth the chance of death (because the alternate is worse).
Sure, and the point I’m trying to make is that if American citizens chances are slim, Australian citizens chances are at least 100 times slimmer. Just saying, I don’t think it’s “muddying the waters” to say that Australians are almost certainly fucked. Sure, a chance in hell exists, if you consider 0.000001% a chance in hell
You're muddying the waters because you're stating that Australians are defenseless, when they are not. Sure, they may not have as many guns - but it does not mean there isn't other means to defend oneself.
As awesome as that video is, and seriously it’s awesome, here comes the national guard. They won’t retreat for rocks
As I said in another comment, Australia is more advanced on the timeline than the US. Everything that’s happening here is something that you rolled over and allowed in the past, and everything that’s happening in Australia is going to happen in the US as we reach our boiling point.
The difference is that our huge mob will also have thousands of guns. I honestly can’t believe that you aussies are so butthurt that you’re actually arguing in favor of fighting a revolution without weapons
(post is archived)