WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

766

https://pic8.co/sh/MN83gB.jpeg

They kept sending out memos as exemptions came in basically denying them before even processed.

After the cut off they sent out this document.

They’ve already denied at least one or two that liberty council helped draft.

A sincerely held religious belief is just that, morals are different. If you’re religious, a sincerely held religious belief is a sin if you go against it, a moral isn’t.

Right here if you’re catholic:

The Catholic Church opposes all forms of abortion procedures whose direct purpose is to destroy a zygote, blastocyst, embryo or fetus, since it holds that "human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception.

We can’t let them set the precedent on what’s a religious belief and a moral. Liberals are constantly trying to change definitions but we have to stop them this time.

Even the eeoc states that the definition of religion is broad and protects beliefs, practices, and observances with which the employer may be unfamiliar. Therefore, the employer should ordinarily assume that an employee’s request for religious accommodation is based on a sincerely held religious belief, practice, or observance

No where do they say redefine religion into a moral or conscientious belief.

Title VII and COVID-19 Vaccinations

K.12. Under Title VII, how should an employer respond to an employee who communicates that he or she is unable to be vaccinated for COVID-19 (or provide documentation or other confirmation of vaccination) because of a sincerely held religious belief, practice, or observance? (12/16/20, updated 5/28/21) Once an employer is on notice that an employee’s sincerely held religious belief, practice, or observance prevents the employee from getting a COVID-19 vaccine, the employer must provide a reasonable accommodation unless it would pose an undue hardship. Employers also may receive religious accommodation requests from individuals who wish to wait until an alternative version or specific brand of COVID-19 vaccine is available to the employee. Such requests should be processed according to the same standards that apply to other accommodation requests.

EEOC guidance explains that the definition of religion is broad and protects beliefs, practices, and observances with which the employer may be unfamiliar. Therefore, the employer should ordinarily assume that an employee’s request for religious accommodation is based on a sincerely held religious belief, practice, or observance. However, if an employee requests a religious accommodation, and an employer is aware of facts that provide an objective basis for questioning either the religious nature or the sincerity of a particular belief, practice, or observance, the employer would be justified in requesting additional supporting information. See also 29 CFR 1605.

Under Title VII, an employer should thoroughly consider all possible reasonable accommodations, including telework and reassignment. For suggestions about types of reasonable accommodation for unvaccinated employees, see question and answer K.6., above. In many circumstances, it may be possible to accommodate those seeking reasonable accommodations for their religious beliefs, practices, or observances.

https://pic8.co/sh/MN83gB.jpeg They kept sending out memos as exemptions came in basically denying them before even processed. After the cut off they sent out this document. They’ve already denied at least one or two that liberty council helped draft. A sincerely held religious belief is just that, morals are different. If you’re religious, a sincerely held religious belief is a sin if you go against it, a moral isn’t. Right here if you’re catholic: >The Catholic Church opposes all forms of abortion procedures whose direct purpose is to destroy a zygote, blastocyst, embryo or fetus, since it holds that **"human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception.** We can’t let them set the precedent on what’s a religious belief and a moral. Liberals are constantly trying to change definitions but we have to stop them this time. Even the eeoc states **that the definition of religion is broad and protects beliefs, practices, and observances with which the employer may be unfamiliar. Therefore, the employer should ordinarily assume that an employee’s request for religious accommodation is based on a sincerely held religious belief, practice, or observance** No where do they say redefine religion into a moral or conscientious belief. >**Title VII and COVID-19 Vaccinations** >K.12. Under Title VII, how should an employer respond to an employee who communicates that he or she is unable to be vaccinated for COVID-19 (or provide documentation or other confirmation of vaccination) because of a sincerely held religious belief, practice, or observance? (12/16/20, updated 5/28/21) **Once an employer is on notice that an employee’s sincerely held religious belief, practice, or observance prevents the employee from getting a COVID-19 vaccine, the employer must provide a reasonable accommodation unless it would pose an undue hardship. Employers also may receive religious accommodation requests from individuals who wish to wait until an alternative version or specific brand of COVID-19 vaccine is available to the employee. Such requests should be processed according to the same standards that apply to other accommodation requests**. >**EEOC guidance explains that the definition of religion is broad and protects beliefs, practices, and observances with which the employer may be unfamiliar. Therefore, the employer should ordinarily assume that an employee’s request for religious accommodation is based on a sincerely held religious belief, practice, or observance**. However, if an employee requests a religious accommodation, and an employer is aware of facts that provide an objective basis for questioning either the religious nature or the sincerity of a particular belief, practice, or observance, the employer would be justified in requesting additional supporting information. See also 29 CFR 1605. >**Under Title VII, an employer should thoroughly consider all possible reasonable accommodations, including telework and reassignment**. For suggestions about types of reasonable accommodation for unvaccinated employees, see question and answer K.6., above. **In many circumstances, it may be possible to accommodate those seeking reasonable accommodations for their religious beliefs, practices, or observances**.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

I can't add to anything concerning religious exemptions. However on both the Pfizer-BioNtech and Moderna (Mode/ Modernise - RNA) Official Vaccine information websites, Exemptions exist, one being (from the official website):

'If you have had a severe allergic reaction (anaphylaxis) or an immediate allergic reaction, even if it was not severe, to any ingredient in an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (such as polyethylene glycol), you should not get an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.'

On an earlier Moderna website (Pfizer uses the very same proprietary PEGylated LNS - Lipid Nano Shell. Which also contains GO - Graphene Oxide but that's another topic altogether and not listed on ingredient sheets as the LNS with GO process of manufacture is 'proprietary'), it stated that individuals may have an existing 'unknown' allergy/ sensitivity (hives, rash, Swelling, redness, shortness of breath) to PEG products such as Shampoos, Soaps, Cosmetic products etc while not realizing PEG was the cause.

Ergo, you have an existing allergy to PEG-containing (Polyethylene Glycol) products. When applied topically, results in immediate (several minutes or whatever) redness, rash, hives, pain and heat at location of application etc. So you're sure as shite not willing to inject the very same ingredient into your own body and risk any potential for severe adverse events.

[–] 0 pt

J&J doesn’t use PEG, so you’d be mandated to get that one. Also you’d need medical evidence/records and/or a doctors note, good luck on the note since they purged all the non-vaxxed healthcare workers.

Also if you look at the lists from the manufacturers of “people who shouldn’t take the vaccines” they’ll deny you for those also, because “it may”, there’s no evidence it will.

[–] 0 pt

Yep sure. I get it. They are going at it hard, in order to get anyone and everyone the jab. Even where they purposely disregard risks stated on the Vaccine manufacture's website. Simply deceiving individuals with duplicitous 'mandate' bull-shittery and deliberately co-opting individuals out of informed consent. My stance has always been the same, I am unable to give informed consent as the long term risks are as yet unknown (Long term clinical studies (Data cherry picking and Methodology obfuscation, imo) are due in 2023-24 iirc. Until then i can not give 'informed consent' and i am resigned to let the cards fall as they may. Good luck.

[–] 0 pt

Yeah it’s crazy, a full list but can’t be exempted and doctors are actively pushing it on those groups also.