It's definitely all of them... but maybe not for the same reasons you'd expect.
It's definitely all of them... but maybe not for the same reasons you'd expect.
If: Aliens = Extra-terrestrial, sapient, material beings that 'evolved' somewhere on another planet out in space.
John Dee's diary describes spiritual encounters and rituals in some detail, and Alistair Crowley conjured "Lam" which was essentially a "Grey," why should I trust extra-terrestrial accounts and not Bigfoot ones? Especially when both have the same issues, like UFOs defying the laws of physics and Aliens passing through solid objects like a ghost, or Bigfoot not leaving any physical tracks/ traces, not impacting the local ecosystem.
"Aliens" as in "Foreigners"- absolutely.
If:
Aliens = Extra-terrestrial, sapient, material beings that 'evolved' somewhere on another planet out in space.
John Dee's diary describes spiritual encounters and rituals in some detail, and Alistair Crowley conjured "Lam" which was essentially a "Grey," why should I trust extra-terrestrial accounts and not Bigfoot ones? Especially when both have the same issues, like UFOs defying the laws of physics and Aliens passing through solid objects like a ghost, or Bigfoot not leaving any physical tracks/ traces, not impacting the local ecosystem.
"Aliens" as in "Foreigners"- absolutely.
Reality is stranger than fiction.
Reality is stranger than fiction.
Reality is more disturbing than fiction too.
Reality is more disturbing than fiction too.
(post is archived)