WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

882

Federal law in the US requires a half hour unpaid lunch break for full time employees. Why does this translate sometimes into a forced hour long unpaid lunch break? I eat in about 10 minutes and I'd like to spend more time with my family. Do employers just plan for chatty lazy assholes to need an hour for lunch, and make the rest of us pay for it?

Federal law in the US requires a half hour unpaid lunch break for full time employees. Why does this translate sometimes into a forced hour long unpaid lunch break? I eat in about 10 minutes and I'd like to spend more time with my family. Do employers just plan for chatty lazy assholes to need an hour for lunch, and make the rest of us pay for it?

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts (edited )

I had to beg to get a daily 30 min unpaid break (I am salary, but less 30 min of my day is 8 hours). Out of spite, my boss calls me to follow up on work-related items. If I don't answer the phone while I am on my 30 min break, he will get even more spiteful. I haven't quit, because I want the experience under the title for my current position to get a better job. However, he makes it difficult. I am generally productive most of the time, and finish client related tasks much quicker than the person I took over for, so I am not sure what his deal is, but the fact that it took them years to find someone who'd stick around long enough to replace the last person should be telling.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

I'd tell you to slash his tires in the parking lot just to show him what spiteful is but I won't.

;)