I figured this out over a dozen years ago. Broadcast media is ENTIRELY a fictional creation of the Gubment. This point can't be overstated, but it can pass through one ear and out the other, so pay attention: there's simply no broadcast media industry without government regulations defining the industry in the first place. The propaganda problem within the media is never that propaganda merely exists, the propaganda problem only happens because the broadcast media is by definition entirely monopolized to begin with. When dissent is banned and censored, dangerous propaganda results, but when dissent is allowed, propaganda is effectively self-corrected by the media-structure. Alex Jones could have a hit TV show, and would, except he'd ruin the whole propaganda gravy-train. As for pornography, it's effectively banned from the broadcast media already, and from most social-media platforms as well, so it's already effectively "banned" from most potential audiences, so I can't understand why the question of banning pornography is even put forth. If pornography is so bad that it needs to be banned outright, then why didn't banning it from the majority of the media not work to quell its negative effects at all?