WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

985

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2776536

Any glaring issues stand out? Methodologies? Was it peer reviewed<<< this is like weird crack to these freaks if it ain't peer reviewed then it is shit! Lol I saw a real scientist shit on peer reviewed as being on of the biggest problems with modern science because it creates a heard mentality

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2776536 Any glaring issues stand out? Methodologies? Was it peer reviewed<<< this is like weird crack to these freaks if it ain't peer reviewed then it is shit! Lol I saw a real scientist shit on peer reviewed as being on of the biggest problems with modern science because it creates a heard mentality

(post is archived)

"The Science" doesn't matter to those who enjoy the narrative...clearly. The science has been saying masks don't prevent infection for decades...yet masks were considered essential anyway. Now there's a study that says masks work, so they'll hop on that, and if it's retracted, the retraction will be ignored. They never needed studies or science, just a narrative to follow.

[–] 2 pts

If mask worked the way these brainwashed npc sheople zombies thing they would have been mandatory in all hospitals decades ago and every flu season the really scared puzzles would have been wearing them decades ago as well