He's full of shit, anyone who didn't commit anything illegal was unbanned weeks ago: https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=6131c2d7559bb
Even this faggot concern troll unfortunately, including vote manipulators like gabara.
The rules regarding porn is the same as on old voat, porn gets heavily downvoted and is a non-issue. We had multiple waves of "ban porn or we'll leave/won't stop complaining", old voat had it too, it is only a leftist tool to gain foothold and set precedence for more rules. Here's one for example: https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=60ccab6ddee1b https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=60ccab6ddee1b&commentid=60ccff3ac526b
And a more recent wave: https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=6146a9fc66f12 https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=6146b686b96ba
JosephGoebbels / Antiliberalsociety is deliberately spreading misinformation, prime jew tag candidate.
He's full of shit, anyone who didn't commit anything illegal was unbanned weeks ago
I guess I'll just have to head over there and see for myself. (If I can remember the password I used when I joined...)
This is why the long version is necessary, he was one of the pedophile ring members that was implicated in the screen caps and links.
While you're there, check out the sub of his friend that he's defending.
I never defended pedophilia nor that sub, you also took my responses out of context. All you do is take quotes out of context.
Weren't you implicated in the screen caps?
The screencaps you made. All your claims of pedo activity on talk.lol/voat.xyz is fabricated, you're only counting on not getting sued for defamation at this point.
I don't even know why you're allowed to do this here.
Yet they were screen caps of your words, they weren't shopped or altered in any way, correct? Your theme seems to be the same be it screen caps or links to threads.
you're only counting on not getting sued for defamation at this point.
Well, I'd like for you to tell me if you or the fake voat admins went to a court to file a defamation lawsuit, how would it go having to defend child exploitation on their site in the face of the legal system?
I don't even know why you're allowed to do this here.
So you believe in freedom of speech when it's child nudity and sexual exploitation, but not when it's the criticism and exposure of it?
Your message is loud and clear.
(post is archived)