Oh, but I'm the pseud. That's hilarious. Your only play is "get a bunch of people to kill a bunch of people." Is it because you can't bear to take the pain of living anymore? Look, if you're so adamant about violence, there's always a hardware store to buy rope from. I get it, man. It's hard seeing what other people can't. Some of us have don't it a lot fucking longer than you though. Did we break down, neck ourselves or try to get the cattle to try to murder each other? Of course not. If we did, it'd be much harder to rebuild. You think that if a bunch of boomers and guys in their thirties and forties got together and killed a bunch of pasties and kicked off a dystopian nightmare that all of the shit you don't like would end sooner. Guess what, you're wrong. Instead, the harsh times would last longer. The strong men would take longer to sprout. The Union would collapse and freedom from Ancient "Monarchical" control would persist in obscurity, not be close to collapse like it is now. What you're doing isn't just unhelpful, it's destructive and something plenty of good people, who you prefer not to exist, want o prevent. Either you're a mouth-breathing swine who thinks the only answer is getting a lot of people killed or you're a fed trying to get other people to agree. Defending yourself is fine. Sure. If someone is trying to harm you or your family or property, you're fully legally backed in various ways. Going on the internet and trying to talk troubled people in to using violence to (supposedly) more quickly fix what you think ails us, however, isn't just not legally defendable, it'll probably get you in a lot of trouble... That is, unless you're a fed and these are the kinds of immunities you're offered.