WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.5K

I expect restrictions on air, bus, and train; perhaps highway and trail as well.

I think the chance of highway restrictions is low, but I'm sweating about it.

I expect restrictions on air, bus, and train; perhaps highway and trail as well. I think the chance of highway restrictions is low, but I'm sweating about it.

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts (edited )

I don't think so because it's impractical. The federal government isn't going to start running borders at the state highway crossings. States occasionally do that themselves, so I could see, for instance, California setting up checkpoints (kind of like they already do for other stuff...) to keep people out. At the airport, the Feds already have an in via TSA, so if they were going to do it they could, however I suspect they will force the airlines to do it for them; because why enforce something yourself when you can dump that responsibility on someone else. The airlines will be better at it anyways. Kind of like they're trying to do with the employer mandate.

It'll never happen between red states, in places where you cross a state line and get, maybe, a sign that says you crossed, if it hasn't been overgrown by trees.

[–] 3 pts

They don't have to set up checkpoints, just license-plate scanners, which are already in many places. BOOM! A week after your road trip, you get a court summons to appear. Then you get charged with felony __________.

[–] 3 pts

I could definitely see this. Also, the weigh stations for truckers could easily be a clot shot check station. How about the dui "check points" could also implemented. I see nothing off the table from this piece of shit dictator.

[–] 2 pts

Exactly...nothing is off the table. Shit can and will get crazier. Today's conspiracy theory is tomorrow's reality.

[–] 0 pt

Not as simple as it seems all my vehicles are held in different companies.

[–] 0 pt

They have already installed these in many major roadways as a "illegal immigration deterrent".

[–] 0 pt

What would that have to do with a clot shot checkpoint? It's individual, not corporate.

[–] 0 pt

How does a license plate scanner tell them who's in the car?

[–] 1 pt

It at least tells them who owns it, that enuff to get started. They also have cell phone readers.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

No checkpoint enforced by state police == no federal dollars. It's the same lever they've been using for nearly all of this COVID horseshit and the same lever they've been using for decades.

It doesn't have to be practical because the goal is to destory the supply chain, starve out non-compliers, and complete the overthrow of the country without triggering an armed citizens revolt. By the time people take up arms it will be too late...no food, no fuel, no way to get at them.

[–] 1 pt

Agreed.
They could care less whether truckers are able to get supply to your local grocery. In fact, that would help their cause. Newsflash, they are happy to kill off the "vaxed" as much as the unvaxed.

[–] 1 pt

I think they could do borderless enforcement. I would simply be subject to penalty for having out of state vehicle plates and identification.

[–] 1 pt

Certain states could absolutely do that. A lot of them, I doubt would want to, and they would not cooperate if the Feds tried to order them to.

[–] 6 pts

I think they will do whatever we let them get away with doing. They seem to care nothing at all about totally destroying the economy. They seem to care nothing about all the lives their crazy mandates are costing. There is no end to their insanity.

[–] 1 pt

Yep, and we are only 9 months into this insanity. They have plenty of time to starve out and depopulate. The media will be complicit in NOT reporting all the deaths so as not to scare the public too much, too fast.

[–] 0 pt

Sometimes these things only take 20 years, sometimes they take much, much, longer.

[–] 0 pt

Maybe 20 years ago.
We have the internet now, so news travels fast.

[–] 5 pts

Besides the fact preventing interstate travel is illegal, it would be very unpopular, even for the vaxxers. They would be inconvenienced too.

On the other hand, laws don't actually matter anymore and the vaxxers seem to not be concerned about being inconvenienced as long as it's framed as being Chinese virus related.

[–] 3 pts

Not if you have your own car but if you use commercial services they will certainly try.

I'm curious to see if insurance companies will require vaccination, even for auto insurance.

Might see a lot of new bike riders going around.

I don't think this will pass constitutional muster seeing if they deny interstate travel or use of roads even by private owners, that is punishment against a specific group and the punishment doesn't stop or slow the spread of the made up disease.

[–] 2 pts

Ha,ha,ha, what constitution??

[–] 2 pts

Imagine that’s what cures America’s obesity problem. Insurance companies.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

Yeah, probably. After what I saw with Milley, and how that is being treated, I have no doubt anymore that they'll do whatever the fuck they want. They're basically untouchable now.

[–] 2 pts

You know how they have the tech for toll payment now so you don't have to stop. It can be used for other purposes.

[–] 2 pts

They already have cashless tolls and police cars have license plate scanners. America is a jewish police state.

[–] 1 pt

I think you're dead on about air, bus, and train.

With public transport covered, they can force a gas shortage and keep ratcheting up gas prices at the federal level. Every $1.00 increase takes some highway travelers out. At 20 or 30 dollars a gallon most people would curtail leisure travel.

You're right OP. I should get a dual sport motorcycle. Thanks for the wake up call.

[–] 3 pts

At 20 or 30 we’d have a lot bigger problems than losing leisure travel. Like food becoming unaffordable for most people.

[–] 1 pt

No doubt. Just saying that at some point people will 'voluntarily' stop traveling. Mass hunger is probably on the program, too. Just later in the show.

[–] 1 pt

Yes, but I think it will be hard to enforce

[–] 1 pt

Not in states with constitutional carry.

Load more (11 replies)