I might be a little biased but I think my husband could do it. But he says he has too much fire in him and not enough sun. I don't know what that means... But he's firey, that's for sure. He is admirably huge and beautiful and very charming when he wants to be but also terrifying sometimes. But he doesn't want to be a leader, he wants to continue making an awesome permaculture farmstead for our family with some of our friends. If society ever does collapse or the supply chain is interrupted enough that people start having a difficult time getting food no doubt my husband will be a local leader... By default, because he has the knowledge and skills and knows the right people to survive and prosper and he's a natural leader. But you know, the half of the country that think masculinity is toxic... Would absolutely hate him. To their core. He is the epitome of masculinity. I think he could gain a large following and lead very well even on a large scale but he would never want to. He would balkanize America if he could. He would further divide states into smaller regions. His ideal society is more towns that might do some local trade but little more than that. He'd walk our technology way back too. He might be a little too Kaczinsky to compete in a globalized society. I mean I don't think he'd leave us vulnerable to being conquered so he might embrace technology out of necessity. I don't know, but he's brilliant and I love him. If he did lead a society it would be a wholesome and organized and fearsome one.