Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

404

IQs in western countries have been falling as a result of immigration and the dysgenic effect of modern medicine, among other factors. Meanwhile the IQ required for employment has been rising, creating an underclass which is unable to secure employment. As the size of this underclass grows something has to give, a phase-change in the fabric of society, so to speak. The elites have foreseen this over a century ago and they have a plan for you and me. For most of recorded history serfdom was the way of life for the vast majority of the population. The serf did not own the land he worked and was perpetually at the mercy of a feudal lord. They want to bring back the system where the 1 percent enslaves the 99 percent. And as the past year and a half has shown the would be serfs want to be enslaved. They want to live in a pod, eat bugs, and have chemicals pumped into their bodies like the livestock that they are. And finally the elites have the technology to make it happen.

Here's my question. Livestock is raised to provide a benefit to the farmer. Checkens are raised for eggs and cows for meat and milk. What benefit would human livestock offer to the elites? Why would they keep them at all? What could they possible have to offer the elites that they can't get through automation and AI?

IQs in western countries have been falling as a result of immigration and the dysgenic effect of modern medicine, among other factors. Meanwhile the IQ required for employment has been rising, creating an underclass which is unable to secure employment. As the size of this underclass grows something has to give, a phase-change in the fabric of society, so to speak. The elites have foreseen this over a century ago and they have a plan for you and me. For most of recorded history serfdom was the way of life for the vast majority of the population. The serf did not own the land he worked and was perpetually at the mercy of a feudal lord. They want to bring back the system where the 1 percent enslaves the 99 percent. And as the past year and a half has shown the would be serfs want to be enslaved. They want to live in a pod, eat bugs, and have chemicals pumped into their bodies like the livestock that they are. And finally the elites have the technology to make it happen. Here's my question. Livestock is raised to provide a benefit to the farmer. Checkens are raised for eggs and cows for meat and milk. What benefit would human livestock offer to the elites? Why would they keep them at all? What could they possible have to offer the elites that they can't get through automation and AI?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (27).
[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Classically once Europe was pozzed people left to the New World to escape it. Not saying Musk and mars are THE answer to this but there is not many places left on the planet to escape too. The New World in those times was likely thought to be as dangerous to them as people like you and I contemplating Mars.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Not saying Musk and mars are THE answer to this

No, I'm saying this is the plan of the internationalists, one of their "plan B" off the wall ideas.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Yeah it's definitely a repeating pattern that people flee to escape the insanity bare all the costs of re establishing only to watch what was built get consumed by parasites again and the cycle repeats.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Nationalism is basically zkylon b to socio-economic and and ethnoreligious demographic parasites.

Even ignoring the "nazi" imagery, nationalisms focus on preventing the metastasis of either communism, oligarchy, or degenerate (((ethnoreligious))) 'capitalism'? (as opposed to free markets) That singular focus on the people, drives out untoward influences by making them explicit enemies of the state.

When lawfare is aligned with warfare, and warfare is aligned with politics, and all are aligned with the demographic interests of the nations dominant demographic, that nation which creates such a culture, prospers and flourishes against less organized, less united, competitors.