WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

678
Honestly, WGAF? We all just assume there is a source and archive in the post.

Honestly, WGAF? We all just assume there is a source and archive in the post.

He's literally retarded
He's litterally retarded
Fuck You!

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Why do you care if the site consists of quality content rather than laziness.

Because they need to stop being NPCs.

Lol...the work you're talking about is the work a script can do. The work of an NPC. There's no reason for a human to have to manually perform that process when a script can do it. It's like long division; yeah, it's good to know how, but if you have a calculator, use it.

Doing long division isn't doing math, and archiving posts isn't providing quality content. Real weird hill to die on man.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

seconds

AUTOMATE GOY

I didn't say the act of archiving was providing quality posts. However the claim you're making is identical to;

...typing words isn't providing quality content.

You're digging a hole and making yourself seem retarded. Everyone understands the most menial of tasks is like a holocaust to a jew. Look at the way you're arguing against people being expected to not rely on a bot. On resources of a man gracious enough to host the site and take the burden on.

Also to expect people to put in a tiny, insignificant amount of "work" to provide other users with meaningful content that avoids jewish scripts, trackers, etc. Is not some meaningless task. It's quite relevant and meaningful. jews kvetch about archive fairly regularly.

I agree that it's a not meaningless...my original comment says as much.

I'm not digging a hole making myself seem retarded. You're arguing for something that no other site I'm aware of demands or even requests; for a task that I've seen nobody but you perform. Not even the Admins seem to do this, and if they do, they don't do it consistently. AOU commented as well with "Coming Soon" so the idea of automating this isn't far fetched or unworthy of consideration.

What you seem to do is assume intent, by rewriting my words with your own thoughts and voice. And you're a liar if you are saying that you do all of that work in seconds. No, you don't. Maybe a minute. Not seconds, that's a lie, unless you're doing it via a script.

Another thing you seem to do is attempt to personally attack or insult those with an opposing opinion, rather than acting like an adult man capable of civil discourse. That's pretty much the first sign you know your argument is failing, and it's a pattern I've seen from you pretty consistently. That's unfortunate because a fair bit of your content is generally rather good.

So, recently a feature was added that alerts you if a link has already been submitted. This process could be performed by the poster by searching the site for the link, but nobody seemed to do that. Yourself included. Posting duplicate content frankly destroys the quality of this place.

So what are your thoughts on that new feature? Will you refrain from using it, and instead begin searching the site first? Will you continue posting duplicate content? Or will you use the automated features because it improves the quality of the site via a seamless and effortless experience for the user?