A Thought Experiment for You | Poal: Say what you want.

497

•

Lets pretend that biden's mandate is enforced, and businesses start testing non-vaxxed employees weekly.

After a few weeks each company will have kept records, and would be able to start drawing conclusions from it. Biden's team would no longer be able to control the data.

Eventually corporate will figure out that natural people are not bringing covid to work, that their natural immunity is working well against multiple strains. Eventually they'll figure out that the published covid data is not honest, and that people protected by vax only are getting sick. Given that corporations run our government, their data will be powerful and used to fight back.

If the country rebels, the biden admin looses. If the country complies it will be armed with data, biden still looses.

Starting to think that trump paid off the biden admin to secure his re-election. Can you make sense of this?

Lets pretend that biden's mandate is enforced, and businesses start testing non-vaxxed employees weekly. After a few weeks each company will have kept records, and would be able to start drawing conclusions from it. Biden's team would no longer be able to control the data. Eventually corporate will figure out that natural people are not bringing covid to work, that their natural immunity is working well against multiple strains. Eventually they'll figure out that the published covid data is not honest, and that people protected by vax only are getting sick. Given that corporations run our government, their data will be powerful and used to fight back. If the country rebels, the biden admin looses. If the country complies it will be armed with data, biden still looses. Starting to think that trump paid off the biden admin to secure his re-election. Can you make sense of this?

[–] • 5 pts

Your flaw is assuming the test results are accurate. Given enough tests your going to pop a false positive. You'll be forced to take a week off, hopefully you don't test positive on your return or it's more time off. Your test is good, great, more tests to come until you pop again and get more time off... eventually you'll be out of leave and paying for your own time off.

link

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

A says they're still using the flawed PCR test and treating the results as "gospel."

parent
link

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Food for thought:

My pain Dr. has a lot of patients. Most are high risk, overweight etc...

Not a single one has tested positive or has had the rona.

Not one single person.

link

[–] • 1 pt

Could you imagine what corporations would do if they were required to covid test, but nobody actually tested positive? Biden might loose his campaign funding!

Wouldn't put it past them to start rigging "false positives" into the covid tests.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

You're also ignoring the fact that many institutions, and therefore their members, need to believe the lies in order to continue to exist. This is a far more powerful force that reality or 'truth'

link

[–] • 1 pt

You wrongly assume that there are sides to this except us vs them. There are no major corporation that isnt (((owned))).

Countries are registred businesses ffs..

link

[–] • 1 pt

(edited )

Testing as an opt out for the vaccine will be interesting; I am not certain how much freedom businesses have to manage it. I have a lot of questions about it myself (out of curiosity, but lucky for me I work for a very small company in which this will not apply).

So, who will pay for the tests, where will the tests need to be taken (will it be monitored like a urine screen) ? What if there is a shortage of tests, and as a result you can't get your weekly test? False positives are also a definite concern as others pointed out.

Obviously, this new requirement is going to be a lot of extra paperwork, and reporting to the government for whomever a business puts in charge of it, which will also increase cost (more time spent on this bs than on lets say payroll or tax). I wonder if businesses can refuse testing as an option in place of the vax due to time and cost, and just choose not hire those who are not vaccinated so they do not have to bother with the weekly employee testing. Either way, it is going to be both disastrous and interesting to see unfold.

With that being said, sure the new testing rule could demonstrate that the unvaccinated aren't brining in COVID like they damn well already know, but it is just too lucrative for the certain government affiliates and officials to let that info become clear to those who don't believe it yet, so I bet that they are going to manipulate businesses into hiring only the vaccinated by making the test harder to get or flat out unattainable just so it will be almost impossible for people to opt for the weekly test alternative.

As for Biden, I do not believe Trump paid him off to secure a re-election. They may very well work for the same people, but I get the impression that Trump wouldn't piss on Biden to put him out if he were on fire, but it could all be theatrics I suppose.

link

[–] • 0 pt

Great point! I wonder if the employer can administer its own test, probably not. It might have to be an outside source for medical/accounting purposes.

There is no doubt in my mind that they're prodding employers to hire VAX employees only.

The issue is practicality. There are currently more job openings than unemployed, they're going to have to accept the unvaxxed or experience serious labor shortages.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

After a few weeks each company will have kept records, and would be able to start drawing conclusions from it. Biden's team would no longer be able to control the data.

You've never worked in a large organization before. Nobody gives enough of a fuck about anything to even analyze the data. The random nerd who actually does analyze it will just be dismissed as a nut.