WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

457

Since when were there no planes? now i'm seeing this shit everywhere. i watched a few of their vids and they're not making a very strong argument. the one which hit the pentagon has always been doubted and questioned if it was a plane or a missile. but the ones which hit the twin towers are clearly on video?

example, some guy trying to make an argument there were no planes in video below cause the chopper lady didn't register it, despite the fact that if you bother to look closely there is a plane and it is moving exactly like a plane, not a missile.

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/084/648/863/original/4fd2915850793eb8.mp4

Since when were there no planes? now i'm seeing this shit everywhere. i watched a few of their vids and they're not making a very strong argument. the one which hit the pentagon has always been doubted and questioned if it was a plane or a missile. but the ones which hit the twin towers are clearly on video? example, some guy trying to make an argument there were no planes in video below cause the chopper lady didn't register it, despite the fact that if you bother to look closely there is a plane and it is moving exactly like a plane, not a missile. https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/084/648/863/original/4fd2915850793eb8.mp4

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 6 pts (edited )

That is not new at all. Even immediately after it there was pictures showing the planes being relabeled in warehouses. Some of the first footage on the news showed planes wings overlapping buildings they should not have overlapped. The real disinfo ones are where people say the buildings never existed.

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4p02s9

Video of Trump saying a plane would not have been able to take the towers down and explosives must have existed. https://www.bitchute.com/video/nBU4JzBUK4LI/

I had thought that "no planes" was complete bullshit conspiracy theory. That was until covid happened. People are malleable and memory is a unreliable. So who the fuck knows. https://theconversation.com/are-memories-reliable-expert-explains-how-they-change-more-than-we-realise-106461

https://poal.co/s/JEWSDID911/434460 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_Music

[–] 5 pts

https://vid8.poal.co/user/Anticlutch/GqLR0gm?autoplay=off

Plane would have to be going mach 8 and have 10 more engines to go that speed, then decelerate to the speed in the video at the last zoom. It was edited in.

[–] 2 pts

It was indeed faked, and I’m glad you mention the wing overlapping a building that’s in the foreground. People say “it was on video” but they don’t understand how fake the videos originally were.

Much like the moon landings, they were edited and made too look more “real” in the years following the hoax.

Also, there were not “hundreds of witnesses.” No one would have been filming at the time of the first crash, that’s statistically highly unlikely —— oh but wait! There just happens to be a film crew who caught the harrowing moment! Yeah right.

And for the South tower, by that point people were evacuating. They weren’t staring up at a burning skyscraper with their cameras. In 2001 no one had smart phones anyway. They were watching on tv, not in real life.

If you’ve been to NYC, you know that it’s almost impossible to see anything unless you’re right there because of all the buildings. Add the smoke pouring from the North tower, and there would have been basically no one standing around to see the “plane” hit the south tower.

As documented in September Clues, all the initial eyewitnesses were either media members or married to media members.

Anyone can go look up a video of “Harley man,” the most obvious crisis actor of all time. The fact that his script involves planes hitting the towers is another huge indication that that is the main part of the illusion being faked.

[–] 1 pt

>Harley man

Don't forget about the legendary

"So pited!"

I understand but it gets rather long if I try and explain all that. The video I included was the second "crash" since you can see the smoke. The evidence is overwhelming that it was bullshit. People programed to just think you should wear tinfoil hat and are crazy if you try and explain it to them.

Here is same video but uploaded in 2006 to YouTube(1st year YouTube operated I believe) shows the wing disappear https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XELamUnF0EU

Yes FINALLY someone else mentions September Clues.

Go man go!

[–] 0 pt

How about all the people inside high rise buildings with a view? I can agree with pedestrians not really having a view but there were plenty of people who had the opportunity to look from a window or balcony.

[–] 0 pt

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4p02s9

Isn't the guy just wrong about that building? Not sure if I could even get an accurate map of the buildings then.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts (edited )

I fail to understand. That is supposed to be real footage. The wing would not go behind the building at 1:14 seconds.

[–] 0 pt

It looks more like it went above that building. The camera angle is from near the ground and that building is fairly short. The towers were much taller than other things around them.