Planes hit the werld trade cntor not the Pentagram or blding Se7en. Anything else is a distraction.

That is not new at all. Even immediately after it there was pictures showing the planes being relabeled in warehouses. Some of the first footage on the news showed planes wings overlapping buildings they should not have overlapped. The real disinfo ones are where people say the buildings never existed.

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4p02s9

Video of Trump saying a plane would not have been able to take the towers down and explosives must have existed. https://www.bitchute.com/video/nBU4JzBUK4LI/

I had thought that "no planes" was complete bullshit conspiracy theory. That was until covid happened. People are malleable and memory is a unreliable. So who the fuck knows. https://theconversation.com/are-memories-reliable-expert-explains-how-they-change-more-than-we-realise-106461

https://poal.co/s/JEWSDID911/434460 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_Music

I tell people, look at illusionists and magicians, look how they fool people on a grand scale.

It's incredible. And if these people, who are not connected to CIA or any govt. agency, can do what they do, imagine what our enemies can do.

So, I doubt nothing. And I believe the planes were added, after the fact.

If someone can prove otherwise, that's fine, do so. I also believe (KNOW) that it was an energy weapon that 'dustified' the bldgs.

It doesn't matter how it was done. The "official" narrative at all four crime scenes---WTC7, the Pentagon, Shanksville, and the twin towers---goes against the laws of physics.

What matters is who actually did it, and how they should be brought to justice.

Yes. The nuclear bomb one is another gayop.

The planes hit WTC 1 and 2, but they used pre-planted charges to cut the support beams to collapse the towers. They literally found traces of thermite in the remains of the towers, although this fact is hard to find on the internet.

Flight 93 was supposed to hit building 7, it didn't because the passengers downed the plane, but they demolished that one anyway with the preset charges. The official explanation for building 7 is bullshit and based on a fake computer model. The building would have never collapsed from a fire. It was not structurally damaged from the collapse of 1 and 2. There's video proving it.

I don't know about what happened at the Pentagon. People speculate about two missing frames from a security camera, but there's smoking gun evidence about WTC 1, 2 and especially 7.

The "no planes", "nukes" and other BS is a distraction.

It's the response of the women in your example video that's the question. She sounds more confused if anything yet we clearly see a plane. Wouldn't she have an even better view? Fuck I didn't want to believe any of this either but who really knows anymore. That's the whole point of our intelligence agencies, keeping us confused and in the dark.

Not sure of the context for your initial statement but air traffic in the US was completely shutdown AFTER the planes hit NY, DC, and PA.

So, IMO, sometime after 11a.m. Eastern, there were no planes on 9/11.

Yes, that is absolutely state propaganda. They take a legitimate theory -that the pentagon was hit with a missile- and make it absurd. Then they use their media power to make sure most people hear their bullshit first so when they eventually encounter the real theory they are already programmed to disbelieve it.

In short, YES.

The fact is, very few people commenting on this board were alive and cognizant when the PLANES hit the towers. That means they're gathering information from what was already printed and spoken. We've seen that get manipulated by these jew fuckers for years now. Over and over they take a fact, rework it, then flood it out to the internet to replace the true version.

The pentagon was a missile. I've only seen two videos of the missile lately but immediately after 9/11 there was one from a gas station across the street. It was so painfully clear that it was a missile. They did one of the silliest, worst video editing jobs on that. When the video made the rounds again, it had a plane blob slapped in to the video that almost looked like a 5 year old painted it.

The towers? We did not possess the technology to fake that shit in 1990, not to any believable degree. HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of people sat there watching the planes fly in to the buildings. The people on the ground heard the explosions from the controlled demolition. We watched the explosions and saw thermite ash showering out of the sides of the buildings before they detonated it.

If it was a missile the entire internet would have spouted this truth for 20 years. This whole "there were no planes" bullshit didn't start till this year.

If you weren't alive and didn't gather info from the beginning, you're trying to make sense of it now. When you pop on a site like this and people are bickering about whether there was a plane, even, it makes the intelligent among us throw their hands up and say "these people are nuts". It discredits any real discussion and makes you look like a complete moron when you bring it up in conversation.

That's their goal.