If alcoholics / smokers should be denied organ transplants because they fucked up their lives then shouldn't the limit on prison time be removed as you've fucking up someone else's life?

Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

233

•

If alcoholics / smokers should be denied organ transplants because they fucked up their lives then shouldn't the limit on prison time be removed as you've fucking up someone else's life?

Does this make sense? >organs being denied to alcoholics / smokers makes sense because they'll just ruin the new one!!! Look up the recidivism rates. Specifically by race. Jail and imprisonment times for any crime in which there is a victim should be infinite. Prove me wrong.

Does this make sense?

organs being denied to alcoholics / smokers makes sense because they'll just ruin the new one!!!

Look up the recidivism rates. Specifically by race. Jail and imprisonment times for any crime in which there is a victim should be infinite. Prove me wrong.

Holy fuck I agree with Anticlutch again.

Anticlutch is drunk again.

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

The unvaxed are trying to convince you that violent criminals are your enemy. Don't believe them.

link

[–] • 0 pt

10 years tops shoot that fag if he needs longer. Personally perfer western days 5 years or a rope

link

[–] • -1 pt

It makes no sense to me that "someone else's" is incorrect with the possessive '. It bugs me.

link