WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

417

So i listen to Maxwell Igan (thecrowhouse.com)

He said that viruses are 40k smaller then the miniscule mask holes.

Truth?

So i listen to Maxwell Igan (thecrowhouse.com) He said that viruses are 40k smaller then the miniscule mask holes. Truth?

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

Issues with mask ineffectiveness come down more to the fact that people touch them and reuse them for days etc.

Basically if you don't use them like they do in an operating theater... brand new, don't touch... they are worse than no masks. They very quickly become a viral version of an ink pad for stamps.

[–] 3 pts

Something never mentioned is goggles. Viruses get into any wet hole they can find. Even N95 masking is useless against viruses unless you're wearing a mask that seals tightly around the mouth and nose, and goggles that seal around the eyes.

[–] 2 pts

Masks stop droplets. Which absorb into the warm, moist fabric. Then when you speak or exhale sharply, etc the droplets are aerosolized and projected out. Oops.

[–] 2 pts

If you can smell in your mask, you can get virii.

[–] 1 pt

That's what I always said...if you can smell a fart, you can smell the virus

[–] 2 pts

.125 micron virus.

n95 won't help.

Full re-breather or go home.

[–] 2 pts

A few handy subs:

/ / / /

on mask efficacy.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Yes, but there is a more complicated factor which is the pressure needed to get the smaller particle through the (relatively) larger hole. I don't know the physics of it, but it's not as straightforward as one might think.

[–] 2 pts

I do know the science. Regular talking provides enough force to aerosolize the droplets caught in the mask. Think fogger .. tiny drops that can hang in the air.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Viruses travel in droplets. The mask will block larger droplets. For example, you know how some people sprinkle you with spit when they talk? They can't do that with a madk on. That's about all they're good for.

[–] 2 pts

Not quite accurate. N95 is intended to filter 95% of particles 300nm or larger. SARS-CoV-2 is ~100nm in diameter. Technically the N95 filter can filter particles smaller than 300nm but not well.

[–] 2 pts

The problem is the common n95 masks have a terrible seal, there is almost always a gap around the nose or under the chin.

[–] 1 pt

The masks you're referring to are probably not N95s. I have yet to see anyone anywhere wearing an N95 (including in hospitals). A proper N95 has metal strips on the nose and chin. Everyone is wearing shit tier surgical masks and useless cloth "masks".

[–] 2 pts

The virus is literally a figment of your imagination because it has never been isolated and proven to cause disease. PCR tests don't detecta virus except your state of exosomes. People get sick and die from fear, and many other possible reasons. We should be more concerned with the poisons that are injected and subsidized into our air, food and water.

[–] 1 pt

Everyone is purposely ignoring generous amounts of studies that prove the ineffectiveness of masks. Stop trying to win by the faggot rules. The internet and Truth are privatized. There is no more objective truth anymore on the internet. It was ruined with deployment of neural networks that cloud reality and disable the ability of any one person to prove to other people that something is real or fiction. Everything is both real and not real. Loads of people are both alive and dead (see Epstein, McAfee or Assange). Welcome to post-objectivity Internet, where autocults wage war against each other, data rot has infested endless mechanisms of data transfer, a digital morality system is designed by AI that doesn't care if you're really alive or dead, where you speak to "God" daily, where crypto-organics flood each digital street corner with world-building babble and where up is down, left is right, it's all made up and there are no organic winners or losers.

Welcome to metamemetics, metanarritives and metawars. How deep do we have to go? Isn't playing Inception fun?

[–] 0 pt

Yes, yes it is. But it removes the task at hand. The here and now.

[–] 1 pt

I'm addressing the here and now, believe it or not.

[–] 0 pt

I liked it.