WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

922

I'm thinking of getting a JD and wondering if smart & good people have a chance or if it's too corrupt and full of woke piece of shit Judges?

Thanks

I'm thinking of getting a JD and wondering if smart & good people have a chance or if it's too corrupt and full of woke piece of shit Judges? Thanks

(post is archived)

[–] 7 pts

Not a lawyer, but did you watch the Derek Chauvin trial? The prosecution was utterly incoherent and none of the expert witnesses agreed on the cause of death.

Still guilty.

[–] 3 pts

I am not a lawyer, but 101 would Be to move the trial out of Minesota and get a retrial over the dude that was a literal witness and Part of the jury?

[–] 0 pt

Chauvin's lawyers were also retards. Horrible plan going in. Horrible court room showing.

You would think you would hear more about a mistrial due to that one nigger jurist that had lied in order to affect the trial. But no. Chauvin would have done better representing himself.

[–] 4 pts

Don't listen to all the outrageous faggots in here. I have actually worked for a federal judge, they just care about getting the right answer. All of the ones I have met were great people. Political bias doesn't have the potential to play a role in the vast majority of cases. There is also appellate review and they'll get reversed if they do something wrong. You would be surprised at some of the minute, seemingly insignificant details that some cases get reversed on. Some state court judges are crazy but state court is generally a shit show because they are so overloaded its not even funny. It's easy to cherry pick a few cases and act like that represents all judges but there are literally tens of thousands of cases handled every day, even more if you include the article 1 judges.

To your specific concern, the bias I think you mean here is extremely easy to detect on appeal. Legal standards get refined by caselaw over time, so unwarranted deviations will be obvious and will get reversed. Sure, there may be some suspicious rulings on discretionary matters, but they will always have a basis for everything else because if they make a legally incorrect ruling they will get reversed on appeal. Judges hate getting reversed. Shitty lawyers generally aren't going to win their cases even if the judge is doing everything they can to help them. Judges can't go outside of the parties' arguments, unless it's a constitutional question, so if the shit lawyer does not make the winning argument for his case, they cannot win. Their case has to fit within the established legal framework, they have to make the proper arguments, and they have to meet their burden of proof for whatever evidentiary standard is required for the matter at hand.

[–] 1 pt

Found the jew

[–] 0 pt

Even if I were, it would still be better than being a liberal who can only make ad hominem arguments.

[–] 3 pts (edited )

Assuming we start a long march through the institutions today, anyone on our side becoming a lawyer, or a teacher, or a doctor, or working in the media are all needed. And not just present in those areas, we need to aim for top of field and to wield real influence. We have to do this as individuals regardless of how we end up using these kind of positions.

We lost influence in those areas because we were blind to what was attacking us. I believe we can gain it back being aware of what we're up against, but the first step is dedicating yourself to rise to the top in one of those fields.

It worked on us because we are complacent and naïve, and are predisposed more to individuality rather than in-group bias. What they did isn't going to work on them like it worked on us, because they know what they did.

[–] 0 pt

You're not wrong, but the industries I mention are still battlefields we HAVE to participate in. Every one of us needs to strive for prominence.

[–] 0 pt

Lawyering is a good skill to pick up if you have time, enough money, and a desire to fight the power. You can add that skill onto whatever you already know and make use of it. You don't have to spend your whole career as a lawyer to make a difference.

[–] 2 pts

It's corrupt af. You'll do fine if you stay in your lane, so to speak.

Just keep in mind those who support the local Bar association gets the most wins.

[–] 0 pt

Corpus jurisdiction secundum volume 7 section 4

Corpus Juris Secundum is an encyclopedia of United States law at the federal and state levels.

Volume 7, Section 4 - Attorney & client: The attorney's first duty is to the courts and the public, not to the client

http://www.gemworld.com/US--AttorneyClient.htm

[–] 1 pt

The worse it is the more you are needed. Don’t let it discourage you.

[–] 0 pt

Depends what kind of lawyer.

Just ask one of the many JIDF members around here, I'm sure at least one of them is also a lawyer.

[–] 0 pt

Jews are shitty people

[–] 0 pt

Talmudic zionists are the worst.

[–] 0 pt

Jews are satanists. Jews are anti Christ. Judaism is satanism. Anyone who defends the jew is anti Christ. The day the jews killed the Christ was a declaration of war against Yahweh.

John 8:44-48  KJV

44 Ye are of your father the devil (Satan) and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth inhim. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.  45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.  46 Which of you  convinceth me of sin? And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me?  47 He that is of God heareth God’s words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God.  48 Then answered the Jews . . .

https://biblia.com/books/kjv1900/Jn8.44-48?embeddedPreview=False

Evidence the Jews wanted Jesus dead

John 7:1 After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill him.

Luke 19:27 King James Version (KJV)

27 But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.

Revelation 2:9 King James Version (KJV)

9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.

Revelation 3:9 King James Version (KJV)

9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.

Poal protects child rapist jews

[–] 0 pt

Just think how many niggers you could put behind bars,smile & put your best foot forward.Good Luck!!

[–] 0 pt

Why does Poal protect jew violence against whites ?

Because jews are working against white Europeans. Jews are racist and violent. ANYONE who defends the criminal jew should be brought to street justice. ALL jews work together to undermine Europeans. Jews are satanists who engage in human sacrifice called "organ donation" aka harvesting LIVE victims.

More racist Jew quotes III

Bill Kristol: White Working Class Should be Replaced by Immigrants

https://dailycaller.com/2017/02/08/bill-kristol-says-lazy-white-working-class-should-be-replaced-by-new-americans/

"Judaism is a religion of hate. The hatred of Christians and all gentiles of all races runs through the warp and woof of Judaism. The most revered rabbis (gedolim) view gentiles as garbage. For example, Rabbi Shneur Zalman, the esteemed founder of Chabad-Lubavitch, taught that the difference between Jew and gentile is not merely religious or racial, but that the souls of Jews and gentiles are completely different in kind. “Gentile souls are of completely different and inferior order. They are totally evil, with no redeeming qualities whatsoever . . . Indeed they themselves are refuse. . . . All Jews are innately good, all gentiles are innately evil."

http://www.whale.to/c/rabbi_q.html

"Wars are the Jews harvest, for with them we wipe out the Christians and get control of their gold. We have already killed 100 million of them, and the end is not yet." (Chief Rabbi in France, in 1859, Rabbi Reichorn.) _____________

'The nuclear family must be destroyed,and people must find better ways of living together...Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break—up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process.Families have supported oppression by separating people into small, isolated units, unable to join together to fight for common interests.' Linda Gordon

"No woman should have to deny herself any opportunities because of her special responsibilities to her children. ... Families will be finally destroyed only when a revolutionary social and economic organization permits people’s needs for love and security to be met in ways that do not impose divisions of labor, or any external roles, at all.” — Functions of the Family, Linda Gordon, WOMEN: A Journal of Liberation, Fall, 1969

_______________

http://www.talmudunmasked.com/chapter15.htm

"all whites are racist by virtue of their birth into a system of privilege based on a false construct of race, thus I say all whites are racist until whiteness is defunct."

"What use are good whites anyway, when 22 years later nothing much has changed for the majority of black people in SA? What did the good white syndrome do to change the systemic nature of racism?"

Gillian Schutte