>"Obviously you have anger issues (You are such a hypocrite)" There's no point arguing over who is more angry than the other, if neither of us are angry. What is written stands for itself. You could have just taken what I said on board and left it at that. >your attempt to distract and derail the conversation. I don't even know what the conversation is because your first reply was nonsense to me, so how can I intentionally derail it? I can only respond to what you've written. What do you believe that I was trying to say in my first post to you? >Why do you keep interjecting your beliefs? Idk, the conversation is baffling and aimless. They are more like ideas & concepts that you may not find in Catholic or Protestant understanding. I guess it's because you randomly accused me of being a Zionist. >Were the Israelites jews or were they Israelites? "Judean" doesn't necessarily mean an ethnically pure Israelite, but someone who lived within Judean lands. I mean, what is a prototypical "Israelite"? What is a prototypical Hyksos or Phoenician? The modern Jews are descended from the Judeans of Roman times, and are partially descended from Israelite populations, but they are mixed like all the other so-called "semites." If someone is descended from Canaan and Judah, are they legitimately of Judah or are they simply a Canaanite? >Why do you use jew interchangeably? How anal do you wanna get? Ashkenazim, Sephardi, Mizrahi. So what one of those is your jews? What one has vast power in the world right now? The Jews of today are the product of the Pharisaic cult that was created after Christianity. It should be obvious to everyone that, whether they are Ashkenazi or Sephardi, Jews are mixture, they are MENA with European admixture. The MENA population were native to that area but that doesn't mean Israelites were typical MENA mixtures. Since they are already a mixture of divergent populaces, and they are actually closely related to Saudis and Palestinians, they probably interpret it differently, they are more like "bloodline supremacists." That's why they render European racial identities down to just skin colour or superficial cosmetic differences. Both Ashkenazi and Sephardi have a lot of power, but not all of them are at the top of the hierarchy. > Why did you leap to cabala? In response to you talking about light extinguishing the dark. Kabbalah is esoteric Judaism and the basis of Freemasonry as well as other cults. That being said, the paradigm set by Kabbalah isn't inherently Luciferian, it's just one side of it. >My response was in response to your response to. I was using an analogy.(Very skeptical that you would fail to understand it.) Q: How do they Deceived All the Nations: Note it don't say All the people But Nations. **This may come as a shock, but I am not the OP you posted to. So I never stated that. You are arguing with the wrong person.** When I replied to you, I was actually confirming that 'yes, even Israelites saw their "Neighbour" as "Kinsmen"' and then I posted that scripture to show that a foreigner within their lands was considered a "sojourner," and a curse. There are many other occasions which show similar sentiments. And even if they were told to be kind to guests (something the Jews don't take on board), they are still making a distinction between "guest" and one of their own. That being said, I think Israelites made the distinction between Shemites, like Arameans, and descendants of other progenitors. Like a caste system. Tamara was a Shemite/ Aramaean, where as Judah's wife was a Canaanite, you can look up what happened in that story. To me, your replies seemed completely incoherent and separate from what I had replied to. >That is where my response comes form about African moving to Europe. In fact Jews believe they have a more godly soul that is far more important than skin color. Yeah, they believe everyone else are animalistic, soulless automatons, which is essentially the same as the concept of "Hylics." > From a Jewish perspective you will never consider your physical proximity to when using the term neighbor and referencing scripture. Jews(Kin) Gentile(goy/outsiders/non-Jews) Nations(Tribes of goy(goyim)). So when you live among the nations as a Jew you do not consider them your neighbor/kin. You may consider them Ken. But I already made it clear in my first post to you that neighbour meant "Kinsmen." So what are you arguing with me for? This is an understanding true of Jews and Ancient Israelites. Although Jews are just a mixed bunch. Genetically, they are not so different from Palestinians or Arabs. https://biblehub.com/hebrew/6154.htm Hence why I say Jews Loxism must be based in Bloodline supremacy. > "You are the one defending your middle eastern religion. " Lol, how? Is "Stoicism" a Middle Eastern philosophy? Is the name "Europa" the name of a Middle-Eastern Princess of Greek Legend? Is the Alphabet which Latin & Greek is based off "Middle-Eastern"? Should I start using Danish runes instead of the Latin alphabet?