Actually wrote more or less a book on the matter; but it is in paper format and inaccessible; so here is a bit on the topic posted to QRV, in November of ‘19, which met with the usual crickets, Not certain it hits all salient points. There may be another. But have become as weary as, apparently, I had become upon posting this: ::: ::: ::; Evolution is not a conscious process of improvement; rather, those traits that exist in those who reproduce are passed on to the next generation. At it’s basic level, in males, it is the urge to fuck that is selected for. In humans (who lost estrus, hence the pheromones associated with estrus, in order to be sexually active at all times, humans being socially sexual, like bonobos) the instinct that was augmented was that toward homosexual rape (present in both male & female nonhuman primates). In females, (since females bear the bulk of the instincts of any species, being the means of reproduction of that species) the traits that were selected for were those geared toward sociosexual bonding. That this sociosexual bonding emphasized bonding between females, is exemplified in the fact that human females experience menstrual synchrony (meaning that socially familiar females can conceive babies at the same time) and that human females (unlike other primates) can feed each other’s babies with their milk. Moreover, (for Europeans) what we define as beautiful is apparent primarily in the female. Yet, males will have sex with any female, even if not beautiful, or each other or sheep, etcetera. Female beauty could not be selected for were males the ones choosing with whom to mate. This same effect is present in the varieties of hair color that exist among European women. Only a reproductive system wherein multiple females were impregnated by the same male, generation after generation, for thousands of years, could specifically change hair color. This is why “people of color,” who reproduce monogamically or permiscuously or via rape, all look roughly the same, are not selected for beauty (except for left over European traits), have black irises, and are of below average intelligence. It it obvious that humans (except for Sub-Saharan Africans & a few other black types) evolved in Europe and Asia, then spread outward and, via miscegenation, devolved into “people of color.” Black skin evolved in those areas where rape was the primary form of reproduction, as it affords rapists with camouflage in the night. When males are the primary input on sexual selection (whether via rape or heterosexual monogamy) it is the male reproductive urge alone that is passed on, selected for, rather than the female instincts toward sociosexually bonding and rearing the young; and humans, effectively, devolve toward being animals rather than humans. Average IQ drops, as well as empathy, altruism and so forth, resulting in non-cohesive communities of folks who hate each other. In any event, those instincts that make us human exist primarily in the female. Yet our culture has been designed (especially via “feminism”) to psychosexually revoke the female instincts of women, and turn them into homosexual men in women’s skin. The vast majority of “heterosexual” couples consist of an alpha male homosexual rapist and his female pseudo-male homosexual partner. This is why everything from politics to religion is set up in a dominance-related hierarchy; and females who love and care for females as females are virtually nonexistent, or a “phase” girls go through, rather than females achieving multiple female lifelong partners, which they inherited the instincts for, but are prohibited from. It is for this reason that so many openly gay and transexual people are suddenly popping up (as they always do, right before a civilization collapses): our children are being sexually mutated due to an absolute lack of proper sociosexual rearing. Properly instinctually functional females are few and far between, if and when they exist at all. Could go on, but bored now. Maybe it will work out.