I don’t have to prove a negative dipshit. The “evidence” for Apollo is highly suspect and inadequate. The “arguments” in favor of Apollo are in bad faith, kind of like how you are trying to pass off the shitty LRO images, which came from the original source anyway and are therefore invalid, as the “high quality” photo or video that I specified. You know that’s not a quality image. Yet you still use it as an argument. You have, therefore, no argument.