LOL, you did it. You linked to a NASA LRO image to “prove” that NASA went to the moon. Wow, if you look really hard at that picture you can see a couple pixels there on the surface. Really convincing!
You linked to a NASA LRO image to “prove” that NASA went to the moon.
Yes, I did. It is the most recent spaceship that can take pictures of the moon. It's more than a "couple of pixels" but you want closeups in 1080p to "prove" the moon landings were real. Sure, let me outfit my DeLorean with space travel ability and I'll get right back to you.
Now prove that atomic bombs aren't real.
You and everyone else knows that those picture show absolutely dogshit. It’s a laughable piece of evidence that should convince no one. Can you imagine if I submitted such images to prove that I have been to Arizona?
And I don’t know what your fixation with time travel is. If the evidence of the moon landings was ever there, it is still there. You do realize the base components of the LEM were allegedly left on the moon surface and only the ascent module fired back up to the command module…. Right?
You and everyone else knows that those picture show absolutely dogshit.
You can see lots in those pics including the tire tracks from the rover.
Can you imagine if I submitted such images to prove that I have been to Arizona?
You can drive to Arizona, can you drive to the moon? Talk about your false equivalence argument.
You do realize the base components of the LEM were allegedly left on the moon surface and only the ascent module fired back up to the command module…. Right?
Yes, there are pictures of them along with a lot of other stuff left on the moon since we landed more than once. Stanley Kubrick didn't fake the moon landing videos for the CIA, pal.
(post is archived)