The reason for that is two fold: * They are hard wired to raise babies to survive for the first 5 to 7 years. This means that, according to the big 5 psychological groupings, women are high in neuroticism and high in negative thoughts. * Females cannot survive on their own in the woods. Female survival is primarily dependent on the group in general, but more specifically a woman has to make a huge gamble by her early 20s: she has to find the highest quality male that she can partner up with for survival because being pregnant for 9 months + birthing multiple children makes women EXTREMELY vulnerable and highly dependent on the quality and capacity of the man she chose to partner up with. Basically women play the highest stakes poker possible in life, she has to trade her youth in to take a chance on a man that she has no way of knowing what are the odds that her life will be okay or shit. So, on top of the previous point, women also have to be extremely self oriented by virtue of their genetics. She doesn't get a second chance either, she only has about from 20 to 40 to really really make things work. I'm not saying womens lives are harder than mens, I actually think womens lives are really easy. What I am saying is that having your youth presented to you by the universe as a poker game fucks with your head. If you know those two things, you can explain a lot of what women do and predict quite a bit about what women will do. For example, here is my attempt at explaining the current state of the internet (apologies for the self promotion): https://poal.co/s/technology/428879 Search for "None of the above" to find my post. There is a bit more to female reproductive strategies and they are asymetric (meaning their behaviours are self interested and don't fit neatly with male strategies like neatly designed puzzle pieces) to male reproductive strategies. Basically, what looks like them screwing us (and yes they do that, but then again we do the same to them) is mostly just neuroticism + negative thinking patterns + couple of other typical behaviour patterns that are survival and reproduction strategies that they cannot turn off. I think the big comparison point here is this: Islam. Look at muslim civilization. Yes, shitskins. Yes, total garbage. But, their men have total control over their societies and their women. I am not saying that we want a muslim society, nor that we want to restrict womens rights at all. I don't think that is necessary for our women. However, what we can learn from that example is that women will submit them selves to the greatest stable and predictable power in their society, and even thrive if it is that power is competent and provides the right kind of guide rails toward justice and fairness. By the same token, if we take the first two points alone, we can think of women as flitty nervous creatures that have a big poker hand to play too early in their lives and by that token we can predict that they will always be looking for a situation that is safe and predictable. That isn't to say women wont take the sword and fight. If anything, over the last 6 years its been our women standing up and yelling about white rights, not our men. So, yeah, you are right. But, there are ways to understand the problem in ways that have past explanatory power and future predictive power. If we can start teaching our men these skills we can start adressing this problem in our ranks. Agreed.