WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.0K

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Just like how most nobel winners are kikes.

[–] 3 pts

Yes. There was a good article written about that subject a while back.

How when the nobel prize criteria was changed from the actual researcher to teams whose credits were negotiated by a commitee...suddenly tons more Jews started getting nobels.

[–] 2 pts

https://nationalvanguard.org/2011/12/the-jewish-bias-of-the-nobel-prize/

"calculations were performed on data for the 1901-1940 and 1941-2010 periods.

A radical change occurred immediately after the Second World War. The number of laureates exploded and Prize-sharing became the norm. This change is often described as the “inflation” of the Prize. It is explained by the acceleration of research and the fact that most scientific work is done by teams today, which makes it unfair to honor only one person. Research redundancy – parallel research and problem solving – is also a contributing factor. Jewish-Gentile Prize sharing grew from a shy ~2.7% to a bold ~24.6% (~9-fold increase). About 10% of Prizes have remained “Jewish only” but the proportion of “Gentile only” Prizes decreased as “J-G shared” Prizes became more frequent. In other words, Jewish scientists more than doubled their share of the available laureate positions because the Gentile share of the “Nobel-cake” declined (Figure 2). The proportion of Jewish laureates grow from 9.4% to 22.2% after the Second World War (p=0.005, n=5) and the percentage of Gentile Prizes dropped correspondingly. (Economics Prizes were excluded from this calculation; they did not exist before 1969.)"

[–] 0 pt

That's wild to go from less than 3% to being a quarter of the Laureates. I remember before going down the rabbit hole or taking the redpill watching TBN "Trinity Broadcasting Network" the Christian channel and that's where I heard the bragging about kikes and the Nobel prize. Thanks for the article