WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.1K

I'm interested to see the responses from people who aren't retarded.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZcXsvZgCRA

I'm interested to see the responses from people who aren't retarded. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZcXsvZgCRA

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts (edited )

Fascism doesn't exist.

Words like fascism, conservative, liberal, communism, capitalism and so forth are labels invented (usually by jews) to perfom the standard jew trick on white people:

  • Misdirect

  • Sleight of hand.

The term "fascism" is a misdirect. How it works is that it is a label for a grouping of things that, once labeled, you can package up, put a bow tie on it and get people to PRETEND that it exists. It's purpose is to break an ideological stalemate by creating something out of nothing. Trump does this all the time, when he is in a negotiation stalemate, he shakes a box (usually via a tweet) and creates a new situation out of nothing around which he can maneuver.

Every single post in this thread is wrong. All of them will try to say something along the lines of government + corporate control nonsense.

The reason this is demonstrably wrong is that ALL CORPORATIONS ALL THE TIME ARE IN COMPLETE AND TOTAL CONTROL OF THE GOVERNMENT. I mean that in both senses that you can read that statement. Most of the time the government controls corporations sometimes corporations control governments.

So, fascism CANNOT exist because it is a nonsense idea.

Or, to put it another way, WE ARE ALWAYS UNDER A FASCIST DICTATORSHIP OF ONE PHILOSOPHICAL WORLD VIEW OR ANOTHER.

Here is how all of this works and it stems from the organizational consequences of trade amongst more than two individuals:

1) There are no such things as economic systems. There is only trade. I pick up a thing, I own a thing. You pick up a thing, you own a thing. We decide to exchange those two things that we own, we have automatically created price discovery and assigned value to the two things that we exchanged.

2) The problems start to arise when a third person wants to insert them selves into the exchange of the two things between two people.

  • Sometimes a third person gets jealous and brings a gun and sticks up both and takes their stuff.

  • Sometimes a whole bunch of other people come along and say they want to tax you on the trade of two things between two people because those people want to build a road.

  • Sometimes the person you want to trade with brings his friends along and tries to muscle you out of your thing.

And so forth.

So what happens? You get together with everyone in your tribe and agree to the rules of trade. Sometimes these rules are simple: everyone gets a gun and protects their own thing and trades how they want. Sometimes, a group of militant tribe members takes guns and forces everyone to give up their things and put them in a pile that the whole tribe can take from. Other times there is an inbetween agreement between tribe members where they forbid all guns, everyone must pay 25% taxes to the tribe and the rest they get to keep for each other.

What you have just done is created an economy with laws that govern trade, all of which are simultaneously arbitrary and ULTIMATELY BASED ON THE BELIEF SYSTEMS OF THE TRIBE WHICH ALSO HAPPEN TO BE DOWNSTREAM FROM YOUR GENETICS.

This also means that you have AUTOMATICALY intermingled government control of corporations. There is NEVER any separation between government and corporations. The very nature of trade and the problems of trade that we are trying to solve means that we are forced to create systems of law and all systems of law are just third parties telling two people how they can exchange things. Or to put a label on it, fascism, or to put it another way, normal consequences of trying to solve the problems of trade between two people.

When you spend your life trying to define terms like fascism, just know that you have been jewed into thinking about a term, a fake category, a shiny label that jews want you to spend your goy lives trying to understand while they continue to infect all the key control points of our civilization and siphone off the profits of the house one percentage point at a time.

Stop wasting your time on nonsense like this and start doing something useful.

[–] 4 pts

The merging of state and corporate power.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

This is the correct answer, a system of government made by Benito Mussolini based on government merging with corporations and control over the people coming from both institutions simultaneously and in sync.

[–] 2 pts

Fascism is the control of the nation's government by corporate entities, for the purpose of achieving mutually desired ends -- the entrenchment of the government, and the enrichment of the corporations. Government and corporations work together to crush any dissent among the people. Most characteristic of fascism is the use of roving gangs of thugs in the streets who enforce the will of the fascist leaders by violence, vandalism, intimidation and assaults. These gangs target anyone who exhibits any independence from the enforced norms. In order to hold this degree of control over the common people, fascists always must gain control over the media, so that they can send forth a ceaseless stream of propaganda.

Problem is I don't see how to keep the corporations from selling out to foreign lands and draining one area in favor of another without some kind of government control over what they can do. Maybe corporations wouldn't exist without government but it seems like a stretch.

[–] 1 pt

Corporations wouldn't exist without governments. Gov grants charters. Otherwise you'd have a business which could still get huge if you're successful, but there wouldn't be any of the legal protections incorporation offers.

[–] 1 pt

If you look at how people actually employ the term, both originally and now, all it really means is anti- Communist. Any thing or system opposed to communism is fascist.

[–] 1 pt

USA, Canada, NZ, Aussieland, UK oddly enuf, the 5 eyes FVEY

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

Italy's approach to Fascism was different from Hitler's National Socialism and Oswald Mosley's proposed parliamentary revision. "Fascism" as an umbrella term ought to be defined by the shared elements between the individual factions.

They define European history before a certain point in history, as being completely Fascist, which tells me it's just a political tool & a pejorative. It means "primitive, evil, racist, extremist political system," and includes any system that objects to or resists Jewish/ Freemasonic hegemony.