Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.0K

"The framework for guiding our thoughts and actions into conflicts that lead to a pre determined solution" -Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel

"The framework for guiding our thoughts and actions into conflicts that lead to a pre determined solution" -Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 16 pts

If a jew wants to do something fucked up and he knows the goyim won't let him do it, then he secretly causes a problem that the only solution to is the fucked up thing he wanted to do in the first place.

[–] • 14 pts

secretly causes a problem

The real power of this technique is the 'problem' can be real, artificial, or imagined.

[–] • 1 pt

covid comes to mind, come to think of it 9-11 too, come to think of it gulf of tonkin, come to think of it pearl harbor, come to think of it lusitania, come to think of it uss maine etc etc etc

[–] [deleted] • 8 pts (edited )

It's a dynamic between thesis, antithesis and synthesis, that is exploited in the information landscape, in culture, politics, etc., to move public opinion, behavior, beliefs, etc., in a desired direction, on a large scale.

For example, abortion acceptance/normalization : Thesis : "My host nation is staunchly Christian, therefore opposed to human sacrifice, and as a worshipper of Moloch I'm compelled to change that." Antithesis, deliberately fabricated to clash with the Thesis : "Women should be able to (((abort))) their unborn child, they deserve to be free of the responsibilities of pregnancy because sexual liberation, "my body my choice", feminism, the patriarchy, etc., also it's just a clump of cells." Synthesis, obtained by framing/influencing/controlling the narrative as the clash between Thesis and Antithesis gradually unfolds : "Child sacrifice normalized as a medical act, a woman's health choice, buttressed behind the rhetoric of women's rights."

[–] • 0 pt

This is most helpful. I becoming well versed and educated in the hard pills to swallow. There are many young in my family and they will not get this info anywhere else. I must be dead accurate and have the best examples

[–] • 4 pts

Create problem(terrorist attack) propose soution(increased surveillance, social engineering, money to fund said programs), implement change to benefit yourself.

[–] • 3 pts

Problem. Reaction. Solution.

[–] • 1 pt

Unfreeze, move, refreeze.

[–] • 2 pts

God you say dumb stuff.

[–] • 3 pts

Ok dipshit. It's Kurt Lewin's model of change with regards to shifting someone's beliefs. It's another piece of the psychoanalytic weapon, along with Hegelian dialectics, that the Frankfurt School introduced to our school system during/after the Cold War.

[–] • 1 pt

it's what they did after 9/11 and it's what they are doing now. Want to control human health at a discreet level, create imagined pandemic threat (where therapeutics are suppressed), introduce 'vaccines' that require regular boosters filled with whatever shit they want to inject you with.

Humans have now literally become the cattle that the elites call you. They call you cattle and now you are cattle cuz you got jabbed and will continue to do so just like livestock gets the needle.

[–] • 2 pts

If people would start realizing they are just cattle to the elites, they would understand the system so much better. I don't know how other countries are, but the US is so convinced they are "free" that they don't realize that most choices are not available to them. Just the ones the elite provide. And the elite are only going to provide what is most cost effective. Just like when a rancher chooses what grain to feed his cattle.

[–] • 2 pts

This bothers me more than anything else about my countrymen.

Voting is a perfect example. The only viable presidential candidates in either party, heavily funded by special interests and upheld by the media long before you could even vote in the primaries, will always agree on fundamental things that much of the population disagrees with- billions to Israel and doing nothing about the Federal Reserve come to mind. Even the things they vocally disagree on, like border walls and ME wars and student loan debt, will see almost no change no matter who gets into office.

But, we get to vote, so we live in a democracy run by "we the people", right? Even if we weren't importing foreign voting blocs and having fraud when the vote goes wrong, we still would not be in control.

[–] • 1 pt

Spot on.

I try not to dwell on it too long. It leads to depression until apathy can take over.

[–] • 0 pt

People getting jabbed are just sheep or cows or whatever domesticated animal you can think of. When people wake up they'll tell the elite to 'fuck' off. Like telling Trudeau or Newsom or any of these cunts to get bent. Say 'no' to their bullshit. They're all inter related.

[–] • 1 pt

If they want to lock you down but know they never could without you killing them, they come up with a fake virus for the libtards to shut themselves (and subsequently you) down for.

[–] • 0 pt

Long explanation incoming.

The Hegelian Dialectic is a piece of extremely bad philosophy proposed by the German philosopher, Hegel. The idea of the "dialectic" - a means of knowing reality by comparison, rather than something like empiricism - goes back to Plato, but Hegel really formalized and modernized the idea.

The basic idea is that you have two contradicting concepts, and instead of throwing at least one one out as false, you recognize that your understanding must be incomplete, and you find an underlying principle by which both can be true.

The famous example is that of water. I propose one concept (the thesis): that water is a liquid. You propose an opposing concept (the antithesis): that water is a solid. These seem contradictory, but a deeper truth comes from understanding them both as true by combining them, to find the underlying principle (the synthesis): water changes its state depending on temperature, and so is wet at room temperature and solid below 32 degrees.

Now, that type of thinking works if you're dealing with very basic concepts like the physical states of water, and if both your thesis and antithesis are undeniably true. However, it's terribly useless philosophy for finding the truth because reality is generally very complex, and because when you have two opposing ideas then it usually means they are logically inconsistent and at least one is false. But, because the Hegelian dialectic is a very academic way of justifying your ideas without relying on proof or logic or real-world testing, leftists flocked to it.

Hegel was pretty famous and academically well-established in his day, so the Hegelian dialectic was long accepted in more moronic academic circles by the time Karl Marx came around. Hegel mostly applied his dialectic to philosophical and spiritual ideas, but Marx realized he could use it as a political tool. So you'll sometimes hear people refer to Marxist Dialectic or Material Dialectic (the term Marx used), but it's fundamentally the same idea of how to get around logic, now political.

Into modern times, most philosophers have abandoned the Hegelian dialectic as a serious way to look at the world, since empiricism has given us things like the scientific revolution. Marxists, however, have plenty experience in duping idiots by using dialectic, and so continue to do so (although they are now usually smart enough not to call it that when they use it). This has manifested in a couple of different ways.

One way is to merely hide a truth that would otherwise be obvious by looking at the evidence. For example -

Thesis: Blacks get arrested and shot by cops at a far higher rate than anyone else. Antithesis: But blacks are just people no different from anyone else, except they're cooler and victimized more and they don't have a history of evil like white folks. How can these both be true? Synthesis: white cops are racist mass murderers, constantly hunting down blacks who dindunuffin.

Of course, the synthesis is false because the antithesis was false. But before idiots, schoolchildren, or corporate TV viewers ever get around to looking up the data showing that blacks are consistently more criminal and violent in communities across the world, they've already got an explanation. Acceptance of the synthesis as an explanation already implies the truth of the antithesis without ever having to prove it.

Another way leftists use dialectic is commonly referred to as "problem-reaction-solution", which is used to get people to consent to policies and power grabs they otherwise wouldn't. For example -

Thesis: Redneck idiot conservatives are refusing to get the safe and effective vaccine against the horrible deadly pandemic for political reasons, thus turning them into terrorists who might kill your children, because we can't legally force them to get jabbed. Antithesis: Government is supposed to protect the safety of the citizenry, and we demand that they do so. Synthesis: the compassionate government will do everything they can to save little Suzy and Grandma by stopping the unvaccinated from spreading - by shutting down their small businesses, preventing them from interacting in normal society, tracking everyone and making everyone present papers, etc.

As you can see, the thesis is the problem that the establishment caused (or simply pretended was real), and the antithesis is the reaction from the scared people who think the world should be in an oppositional state from the thesis. The synthesis of the two is always a solution where the establishment are "forced" to do things that the population would normally disagree with, because it's the only way to help the scared people.

[–] • 0 pt

James Lindsay is the point man for understanding CRT, neomarxism, postmodernism, and the various offshoot ideologies of hegelianism. He goes very in depth on Hegel, the Young Hegelians, and the Hegelian Dialectic, and other concepts like aufhaben der kulture that are all part of this "color revolution" woke bullshit we see today

His podcast, New Discourses, has a 4 hour breakdown of Hegel that is must listen. I listened to it on spotify.

You should also look into the Grievance Studies Papers he, Helen Pluckrose, and Peter Boghossian worked on where they submitted a bunch of well written (in the woke academic sense), but bullshit woke papers to different feminist, gender, and black studies type journals. They ended up getting a handful of them peer reviewed and published despite the papers being ridiculous and basically bullshit which undermined the notion that this woke shit is academic. Hilarious stuff but also frightening

[–] • 1 pt

Those papers were hilarious.

I didn't know he had a podcast. Thanks for letting us know.

[–] • 0 pt

For sure. The podcast is wonderful. I've been binging it lately to learn as much as possible. Lindsay is great at distilling these complex topics

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

Hegel was an Objective Idealist philosopher. That means he believed, or at least pretended to believe, that reality consists of the thoughts of "the Absolute Spirit", whatever that is.

History is then the changing of a mind over time, which follows a dialectical pattern: two contradictory ideas are entertained, one after the other (thesis and antithesis), and finally a new understanding emerges from the conflict (synthesis). This in turn becomes the starting thesis in the next stage of the dialectic.

In the broader cosmological perspective, the Absolute Spirit is steadily advancing towards self-consciousness. History is the working out of this inevitable process. Thus the arrival at the destination will be the end of history and the beginning of a new kind of existence. The final fulfillment of this ascent to a higher existence was supposed to be Nineteenth Century Prussian monarchism, with Hegel himself as the prophet and midwife of the new age.

The whole system is essentially irrational and mystical. The three-stage scheme is a recurrent theme in mysticism. Stage one: the past golden age, good but flawed, couldn't last. Stage two: the horrid present, scene of suffering and injustice. Stage three: the perfect and eternal future paradise.

[–] • 0 pt

These leftist fuckers will spin word salad horseshit and interpret it however the fuck they like.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

People will write the thesis, entithesis, synthesis bullshit.

This isn't what this is at all. What it is simply a negotiating tactic, one of a number of negotiating tacticts.

The name given to the technique makes it seem like it is something sophisticated. It isn't. When somone tells you HG is thesis, entithesis, synthesis, all they are saying is this:

  • You want to buy something, you make a low offer.

  • The seller wants a higher price, he givers you the BIG ASK.

  • You both settle in the middle. If you are an experienced buyer you settle closer to your line. If you aren't an experienced negotiatior the seller not only gets closer to his price but he has moved the line of expectation around the exchange closer to him for everyone.

This is basic bitch negotiating tacticts. The reason that it is called Hegelian Dialectics is another jew trick: When you have a lot of stuff to sell, the best way to maximize your earnings potential is to repackage the giant pile of bullshit into smaller piles of bullshit and make the packaging look nice.

So, in order for Hegels to make a few shekels, he has to sell white people on a bunch of white paper. In order to sell this paper to goy, he has to put some letters and numbers on a page. What does a jew do in this case? Does a jew come up with something new of value or does a jew take the same old bullshit and wraps it in a new shiny paper and puts a bow on it?

Of course, what else would Hegels do to make money? He took the standard negotiation tactic, labels it the Hegelian Dialectic and we have retarded white men DISCUSS JEW TRICKS FOR THE REST OF THEIR LIFE. ON WEBSITES THEY FREQUENT.

BECAUSE WHITE PEOPLE ARE SO FUCKING STUPID THEY CANNOT TELL WHEN THEY ARE BEING CONNED.

Anyone that cannot see HD for what it is, negotiation tactics, has been jewed.

Load more (4 replies)