It proves there is an unmanned refractor, put onto the moon by men, you fucking abject mongoloid.
You're ngmi.
Yuuup. Keep believing baby.
"The reason I asked these questions are because it is highly unlikely you could target a tiny little object at that distance, whilst completely and perfectly perpendicular (which would only happen very briefly at a very specific time of day, and from a very specific location), whilst also having perfect weather conditions, nullifying the effects of refraction through the ozone layer, and also being focussed enough to travel almost a million KM and return directly to you and provide a result. Even more so that such a feat could be pulled off 100's of time each week."
You are honestly a waste of life. You outrightly reject dearths of evidence gathered by millenia of white genius. You reject provable physics and objective reality. We'd be better off if you self-deleted. I'm not even joking when I say that.
Just something I came across, it doesn't make much sense to me but I figured an expert like yourself could explain it.
I did, however, do a lot of research on those refuting the moon landing. Boy, was that laughable.
Even just looking at pictures of the ship on the "moon" was hilarious.
Have a good weekend.
Is that what you say when you can't refute counter arguments?
(post is archived)