And that's fine. I know the earth is round but space might be fake and gay. All the math adds up to the fuel and weight vs thrusts escape the pull of earth's gravity. There are reflectors on the moon you can shoot a laser too and get a return. So I'm just wondering what the facts in an argument would be that we never went to the moon.
I know I've seen videos that nasa has stated they don't have the technology to go to the moon any longer and that confused the shit out of me as well.
not op, but iirc the moon landing stuff is full of fakery and inconsistency because there was a real concern that they weren't gonna make it. So they made sure footage and media about a succesful mission was available regardless of the outcome of the mission, for posturing purposes. This was cold war era, and people actually gave a shit, so this publicity stunt (which the whole mission was as nobody actually gives a fuck about moon rocks) was extremely important.
Or maybe space really is a hoax lol. Regardless this is all muddy-the-waters tier bullshit. We have have enough problems to deal with on our own rock for now
It's not that space is a "hoax" just that it's physically impossible for humans to land there, primarily due to the Van Allen Radiation belts.
I don't have a "dog in the fight" so the speak but once you're not afraid of the info you come across, you start to see how foolish what we're taught is.
The issue being, most people are "plugged in" so they see the world through a certain skewed lens, it's very weird.
physically impossible for humans to land there, primarily due to the Van Allen Radiation belts.
Simply not true. A sea of information invalidates this talking point. Yet it persists. Which shows that those who push FE and fake space never actually research anything.
not op, but iirc the moon landing stuff is full of fakery and inconsistency because there was a real concern that they weren't gonna make it. So they made sure footage and media about a successful mission was available regardless of the outcome of the mission, for posturing purposes. This was cold war era, and people actually gave a shit, so this publicity stunt (which the whole mission was as nobody actually gives a fuck about moon rocks) was extremely important.
This is the real correct answer.
He said nothing of substance.
Just check out those docs, the moon doggle one being the best.
The shooting a laser as proof is funny.
No one refutes a ship didn't launch, just that it remained in low earth orbit.
It's another event that didn't occur the way we were taught, like the holocaust, that you just assume to be true because the alternative is that everything is a lie and many people can't handle that.
The shooting a laser as proof is funny.
Why?
Look into it. It proves nothing but the r/science types lap it up.
I've been completely schooled on the holohoax. This is my next journey.
The whole "MUH VAN ALLEN BELTS" killshot they'll present is pretty much a paper tiger.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9YN50xXFJY
But there is a ton of obvious horseshit from all sides of the debate. Wouldn't be surprised if there was agents submitting bullshit as they were in PROJECT BLUEBOOK type effort to muddy the waters on the moon as well as aliens.
(post is archived)