WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

445

Robert's videos are awesome and on poal we know that he speaks a lot of truth that we don't normally encounter.

That said, this guest that he had, who seems informed about the events of the wars and the nature of the national socialists, also said that it was true we landed on the moon.

Now, anyone who's done any research on this topic knows there is no way we landed on the moon, so what do you think is going on here?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8qqR5dJOpRo

Edit: if there's a more appropriate place to ask, let me know.

Robert's videos are awesome and on poal we know that he speaks a lot of truth that we don't normally encounter. That said, this guest that he had, who seems informed about the events of the wars and the nature of the national socialists, also said that it was true we landed on the moon. Now, anyone who's done any research on this topic knows there is *no way* we landed on the moon, so what do you think is going on here? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8qqR5dJOpRo Edit: if there's a more appropriate place to ask, let me know.

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

Tell me again why you think we never landed on the moon? ELI5, point me to anything that says we didn't go to the moon. I'd like to be redpilled on this as well.

[–] 3 pts

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon

[–] 1 pt

Nothing funny about Chef Dong's Chicken. It always good

[–] 0 pt

Okay. I'll watch this video.

[–] 2 pts

Cool. I'm not gonna go back and forth debating the issue. I just know it's hard to find this stuff so I wanted to share the link. Have fun.

[–] 0 pt

https://poal.co/s/Space/425731

Most popular spring board topic is completely debunked. I doubt you'll care, but here for others so they are not duped.

[–] 2 pts

Because I chose to actually look at why people have said we didn't then come to a rational conclusion.

Check out, wagging the moon doggle. That one is most informative, there is also the documentary called American Moon that is quite good.

If someone can present something better that refutes those, then i'd love to change my opinion but for now, based on any evidence provided, there's no way we landed on the moon.

This is why i'm confused about the video: Robert speaks a lot of truth, I don't view him to be controlled op so I don't understand the intention of having such a guest.

[–] 0 pt

I will check out them Documentaries later because you sound pretty confident about them. I feel the same way about a 9/11 Documentary called "Anatomy of a Great Deception" which really opened my eyes about that day.

[–] 2 pts

Please do, I suggest the moon doggle one between the two of them.

Awesome, I too, am aware of the 9/11 garbage but haven't seen that doc, will check it out; thanks for sharing.

Have a nice weekend.

[–] 1 pt

Careful. Next he'll insist the eatth is flat...

[–] 2 pts

And that's fine. I know the earth is round but space might be fake and gay. All the math adds up to the fuel and weight vs thrusts escape the pull of earth's gravity. There are reflectors on the moon you can shoot a laser too and get a return. So I'm just wondering what the facts in an argument would be that we never went to the moon.

I know I've seen videos that nasa has stated they don't have the technology to go to the moon any longer and that confused the shit out of me as well.

[–] 2 pts

not op, but iirc the moon landing stuff is full of fakery and inconsistency because there was a real concern that they weren't gonna make it. So they made sure footage and media about a succesful mission was available regardless of the outcome of the mission, for posturing purposes. This was cold war era, and people actually gave a shit, so this publicity stunt (which the whole mission was as nobody actually gives a fuck about moon rocks) was extremely important.

Or maybe space really is a hoax lol. Regardless this is all muddy-the-waters tier bullshit. We have have enough problems to deal with on our own rock for now

[–] 1 pt

Just check out those docs, the moon doggle one being the best.

The shooting a laser as proof is funny.

No one refutes a ship didn't launch, just that it remained in low earth orbit.

It's another event that didn't occur the way we were taught, like the holocaust, that you just assume to be true because the alternative is that everything is a lie and many people can't handle that.

[–] 1 pt

The Apollo missions are alleged to have LIVESTREAMED video from the surface of the moon in 1969-1972. How much power would that take? How come there's no interference in the signal?

The Apollo 8 mission was the first manned Saturn V rocket mission. And also just happened to be the first time NASA sent mammals beyond the Van Allen belt. No monkeys, dogs, rats or any other animals were sent up by NASA ahead of time to test the viability of man traveling through a very dangerous region of space. Why did they first test sub-orbital flights with monkeys, etc... but not travelling through the Van Allen belts? Most people know that there are 2 Van Allen belts. Did you know there is a 3rd Van Allen belt? NASA certainly didn't know this at the time.

I could go on but once you start researching Apollo and asking logical questions, the whole story falls apart. A good piece asking reasonable questions to make you doubt the endeavour can be found here: https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie/

[–] 1 pt

If you watch a lot of Robert's videos as I have, you'll probably notice a couple things:

First, he endorses ideas that are speculative and sometimes can be contradictory, in the spirit of entertaining different theories. He may talk about the moon landings or entertain the idea that we went there without 100% believing it.

Second, he seems to believe in the "Secret Space Program" where various powers, including the (former?) National Socialist government of Germany had "UFO" technology. He talks a lot about the Vril Society, the Antarctic base discovered in Admiral Byrd's mission, NatSoc UFOs observed in combat, etc. Since the U.S. brought in many NatSoc scientists following WWII, the U.S. may have developed these technologies as well. He may believe that we went to the moon using some form of secret technology that couldn't be disclosed, so the government created fake "rocket missions" to give the public the idea that we went there using the available technology in the 1960s.

Personally, I think the more likely explanation for moon mission fakery is that we didn't go at all, and it was faked for propaganda reasons. But these two points above may explain why Robert would entertain or even endorse the idea that we went.

[–] 0 pt

"Astronauts Gone Wild" convinced me, you can tell they're all lying.

[–] 0 pt

Eat shit flat earth faggot.

[–] -1 pt

Still undecided on the earth. I like the hollow earth so I don't think it's flat.

Enjoy the rest of your weekend.

[–] 0 pt

Bless anybody who believes one way or the other. Water is too muddy for me