WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

952

Whether we are talking about cops, teachers, pilots, nurses, or even walmart employees, these all have retirement plans from their employer. It's almost as if they are trying to kill off their aging workforce before they retire and the employer has to start paying out what they promised.

That got me thinking, are there any employers who made the vax a requirement without having that conflict of interest? I could not find any...

Whether we are talking about cops, teachers, pilots, nurses, or even walmart employees, these all have retirement plans from their employer. It's almost as if they are trying to kill off their aging workforce before they retire and the employer has to start paying out what they promised. That got me thinking, are there any employers who made the vax a requirement without having that conflict of interest? I could not find any...

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

You're saying "retirement = pension" or a long term obligation for the employer. It doesn't work that way for MOST employers. Government, municipal, public schools, state governments, etc. and bigger unions are the last bastions of pensions. It's not as common as it once was. Most employers will use different ways to provide retirement benefits that also limit their long term employee retirement expenses.

You should ask yourself which one of those employers is better off with dead employees? If you'd like to be conspiratorial about it, check out how the Chinese are flooding out their own farmers.

The longest term retirement liability might be social security. It would be to the government's benefit to cull the ever-growing herd.

But then we can't have our conspiracy about Joe ruining the country with currency debasement.