I appreciate your approach. At least you make an attempt at an argument. I think that if we explored the topic you’d have to really close that gap you have thats resting heavily in faith and assumptions. Maybe we’ve been lied to from before the start we even know of but that’s quite a convenient argument to make considering that the burden of proof is on the believer, aka you in this conversation.
I won’t dispute or go back and forth over all these points but I will say that if you were ever sitting across from me I’d be very open and eager to discuss all these topics.
(post is archived)