WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

869

I think our ego (the self we grow through our daily experiences) dies, and is no more. But our core remains and is reborn, and that we are indeed sentient after death. There are just too many things that point to this fact. But i am curious to discuss the point with those that care to engage.

Disclosure: i am not a religious faggot.

I think our ego (the self we grow through our daily experiences) dies, and is no more. But our core remains and is reborn, and that we are indeed sentient after death. There are just too many things that point to this fact. But i am curious to discuss the point with those that care to engage. Disclosure: i am not a religious faggot.

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

1) your understanding of the true christian faith is laughable, I shall try to be kind in my explanations but you are making it hard

2) christianity is literally a giant redpill on the kikes, if you don't know that then this simply confirms your lack of understanding about it...name one good reason kikes would "create"....oh wait...they don't create, they only twist and manipulate that which is already created...that should be your first hint.

3) There is literal scientific proof of an afterlife you people are just too afraid to dig on it...let's start with some idea's to warm you to it.

fact 1 - all cosmic background radiation eminates outwards from a central point, that central point being earth...meaning our planet just "happens" to be on the very same spot in space that our universe began from.

fact 2 - existence of people who use the name of "god" to grift people does not prove god does not exist...it proves people will use anything to cheat others, regardless of what the "thing" is, so long as it's something other people care about it can be a tool of manipulation, that's it, your conclusion is a biased one on that score and not a rational conclusion

fact 3 - there have been plenty of cases where people DO in fact, remember past lives, these have been documented, again, there are obviously going to be fakes in there, but as i stated in fact 2, that's true of anything (look at art, counterfeiting art wouldn't exist if the art itself had no monetary value).

fact 4 - the genetic history of the adamic people has been wildly manipulated (aka white people)....for example, egyptian pharos were white people, then there's the issue of tartaria and atlantis being non mythos and physically real with evidence supporting their existence.

fact 5 - here is one I find is stronger then the rest I have provided, the rest are more of a "we have been lied to for so long how would you even fucking know at this point what is "possible" when our foundational knowledge is so filled with lies". Fact 5 deals with the fact that the Bible speaks of nephilim, aka, motherfucking giants

Now...dig on the smithsonian, they covered up giant bone discoveries for more then 100 years...they had factual, real, hard evidence of 15-20foot tall motherfuckers, and those were speculated to be "children" for the race.

Physical proof of the "angels mating with the daughters of men" from the bible.

You don't get the value of religion, you really don't...because it's not a grift, it's legitimately real. You just can't deal with the fact it's real, it's ok, I had trouble with it at first as well

[–] 1 pt

Wow, Just Wow!

But no links to pictures, articles or even references to a bible.

Facts expect proof!

[–] 0 pt

no...lazy useless people who refuse to educate themselves demand instant gratification, you want to learn without digging yourself and spending any time, that's not how this works son.

I'll do one for you, just to prove what I'm saying are not the ravings of some nutjob

https://www.gaia.com/article/this-conspiracy-claims-the-smithsonian-destroys-giant-skeletons

here's an attempt to debunk the "conspiracy" to show you the counter argument

As far as sources proving, there are many and I don't want to precondition you to any one source, So I will give you the starting point and from there you can travel on the way yourself

The lost city of Giants, Petra, has doorways in buildings that are clearly made for creatures much bigger then ourselves. During a time where such works were supposed to be impossible based on our current "tech" development

https://archaeology-world.com/the-mystery-behind-the-18-giant-skeletons-found-in-the-usa/

^ a source that is "pro" theory, discussing evidence, plenty of videos on bitchute about this subject as well

[–] 1 pt

Well no! That is just how it works. You made the claims you need to back them up with evidence, just like when I rebutt your claims, I back it up with evidence.

So you don't have the evidence on hand? Are you just spouting off nonsense hoping to con people into believing what ever you say?

Statement: The sky is red go look for the proof yourself! Rebuttal: Look outside the sky is blue. My rebuttal, my proof!

[–] 0 pt

God is real, Jesus was real, all the other wisemen of old were real.

Religion is a scam, like a pre written code of conduct to get on his goodside. As long as you bow your head to the priests..

Everything you wrote i agree with, xcept that religion is real (as in true way of communing with our Grand Creator)

[–] 0 pt

"real"

a subjective term really lol...if you mean organized religion with the priests and all that yea that shit is fake and gay but there is an underlying cache of information that we have yet to access so we can't actually say if religion is "shit" as a concept just yet, too many variables still in play, for example the firmament, is that an actual "dome"...or a metaphorical representation of some force keeping us on this planet? alien tech? van allen radiation belt?

far too much fake and gayness around "space" in general for me to not think it has something to do with the nature of religion, that's literally why they created the heliocentric model in the first place, to discredit the idea that we are a created people.

I just want special access to classified information so we don't have to fucking "guess" at this shit and could just read what the truth it removed from speculation

[–] 0 pt

I appreciate your approach. At least you make an attempt at an argument. I think that if we explored the topic you’d have to really close that gap you have thats resting heavily in faith and assumptions. Maybe we’ve been lied to from before the start we even know of but that’s quite a convenient argument to make considering that the burden of proof is on the believer, aka you in this conversation.

I won’t dispute or go back and forth over all these points but I will say that if you were ever sitting across from me I’d be very open and eager to discuss all these topics.