My comment is supposed to be a joke about assault weapons bans. It's not the dog/weapon, it's the nigger owner. But this dumb fuck OP just commented about "home defense dogs" like Biden saying get a shotgun
I was making a similar joke word wise, but was what I said wrong? There are plenty of dog breeds and even other animals that can defend a home.
As far as "its the owner" bullshit line, we can agree that niggers are as a group violent and disease ridden in comparison to other groups and say "we should remove them from our communities". But if someone says "Pitbulls as a group are significantly more violent than other dogs and we should remove them from our communities" all these emotional cucks start crying.
One is removing hostile racial enemies, the other is putting restrictions on what can be owned.
Not restrictions, I mean actual complete genocide of a breed that lacks any redeemable value. Outside of wanton violence there is nothing they do better than any other breed.
If they "recreate" the breed from its original lines and it does not end up breaking the charts for random attacks (and lethal attacks) then I would have no issue with it.
I agree with you. Pit bulls, as a breed, are wildly unpredictable, and there are many instances of the nice family dog mauling a kid. Too many people say "it's all about the owner." That's like saying black crime is all due to culture and not genetics.
Someone else just wrote "Get rid of nogs first so we can be sure". Which I agree is a good point to be made.
On the other end I dont trust the animals, and they are the result of their history, we cant ignore how genetics manipulate niggers, or all the billions in education could have fixed some of them. The same applies to an animal that was designed to fight and kill.
(post is archived)