I dont have to prove anything, and again I dont give a shit about you.
I asked should they be genocided and so far the answer is yes over no. Knowing how you cucked pit lovers are seeing that will nag at your for weeks.
I dont have to prove anything,
I'll repeat myself: this is correct but by not doing so it renders your argument invalid.
and again I dont give a shit about you.
And yet another response from you
I asked should they be genocided
In the original post. Please provide an example of me responding to your original post rather than an invalidation of your faulty opinion as fact.
Knowing how you cucked pit lovers are seeing that will nag at your for weeks.
I can only guess at what you are attempting to say here. But it does look like you are making another assumption based on a lack of evidence
Imagine giving a single fuck about proving someone wrong about nigger dogs on a site that you lack the balls to tell your coworkers you visit.
There are three kinds of people, those that know that nigger dogs are violent, the people who dont care, and the cucks who think they can argue out of the gigantic hole that is public opinion on violent nigger dogs.
Imagine giving a single fuck
Again, you are still replying. I'm still laughing.
about proving someone wrong about nigger dogs
Your inability to comprehend facts vs opinion is disturbing. You should also know that I don't care if you keep refusing to listen. I have children. I don't argue with them either. They just do what you are doing, being stubbornly stupid, and get hurt. Since you are slow, I'll clarify what I mean here. You are as stupid as a child.
on a site that you lack the balls to tell your coworkers you visit.
Project much? I'm self employed. Good luck with that line of thought.
those that know that nigger dogs are violent
That's an opinion until you can provide a measurable stat that proves otherwise.
the people who dont care
About your nonsense argument? Or about you using an opinion in place of evidence? There is an important distinction.
and the cucks who think they can argue out of the gigantic hole that is public opinion
You have inadvertantly admitted that you have no facts to form an argument with and are simply repeating what you believe to be a public opinion. This is the lowest form of debate. I've given you many chances to provide something factual and you have failed miserably.
Your intelligence level is evident.
(post is archived)