If you didn't value a stranger's opinion, you wouldn't continue to try to sway it. The difference between us is that I've actually seen the stats you are attempting to incorrectly use as evidence of your argument. If you are prepared to argue provable facts, I'll be here. But I think you just want to rant and spout your opinions in an echo chamber and I'm the wrong person to respond to. I'll just take you for a long walk in circles, using your own logic against you.
Still waiting for how you can spin one single group of dogs being so over represented in violent attacks into something positive.
You are trying to sway my opinion, I dont give a single fuck about your opinion. Your choice how you want to waste your time.
I'm still waiting for you to prove your statement. Should be fairly easy considering the data is widely available. In case you haven't been following the conversation, this is about you making wild claims with zero facts.
You are trying to sway my opinion,
Nope. I'm calling you a liar.
I dont give a single fuck about your opinion.
Yet you keep responding.
Your choice how you want to waste your time.
Yup. Like I said. I'm amused. As soon as I'm done shitting, you will be a distant memory just like the turd I flush.
I dont have to prove anything, and again I dont give a shit about you.
I asked should they be genocided and so far the answer is yes over no. Knowing how you cucked pit lovers are seeing that will nag at your for weeks.
(post is archived)