WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

457

In the last week +/-, I've noticed a downtrend that cuts my worthless internet points when I was approaching level 30. Screenshots: https://files.catbox.moe/o2hztx.jpg

https://files.catbox.moe/8ca0h5.jpg

https://files.catbox.moe/rqyf6b.jpg

So I asked u/aou about the de leveling and here is s/h/its response:

https://files.catbox.moe/v1vg8d.jpg (lol)

No, no, it just can't be that someone holds an opinion that runs against the zeitgeist here without being a paid shill, right? Have your say, as long as it doesn't rain on the mod approved narrative. Free as long as AOU goes for it. This is the definition of fascist, and I thought deaditt was bad.

In the last week +/-, I've noticed a downtrend that cuts my worthless internet points when I was approaching level 30. Screenshots: https://files.catbox.moe/o2hztx.jpg https://files.catbox.moe/8ca0h5.jpg https://files.catbox.moe/rqyf6b.jpg So I asked u/aou about the de leveling and here is s/h/its response: https://files.catbox.moe/v1vg8d.jpg (lol) No, no, it just can't be that someone holds an opinion that runs against the zeitgeist here without being a paid shill, right? Have your say, as long as it doesn't rain on the mod approved narrative. Free as long as AOU goes for it. This is the definition of fascist, and I thought deaditt was bad.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Hey Pettifogger-Bro. Ya, you're not crazy, he did the same thing to me and others, all the people who told me about it he just "happens" to dislike. Months ago I had noticed a small number of points go down and thought I was just misremembered. Then someone else had said the same thing and there seemed a plausible explanation that some 'shill' accounts had been banned. I didn't think anything of it. Lo and behold, I start to get pretty close to 30 and notice that my level changed, so I took a screen shot and, wouldn't you know it, I'm down over a thousand points in about a week. https://files.catbox.moe/9br3fr.png 7400 points and it was already down, that's just when I thought to screenshot it

As of today it's 6440... so ~ 1/6 th of every upvote was from a 'shill' and algo decided this in normal reddit style with no proof to you or me? That seems pretty unlikely. Now it could be true, but given the reliability of the source making the claim, I have no reason to think so.

If you'd like an explanation as to the difference between the algorithm and AlgO-U (the person), I laid it out and was banned from the sub for it (despite being on topic and almost certainly accurate). As you said, free speech, so long as doesn't trigger a certain someone.

I had more than a dozen people on various platforms warn me about how the rules arbitrarily change when he doesn't like you for years. I didn't want to believe them, because I'm a proper Poal fanboy... used to be his fanboy too. Between his sperging and the more than a dozen people I've known for a long time telling me about the shenanigans. The dilemma became believe everyone or believe one person who proved himself to be both petty and shady. It's really too bad what's been happening to Poal. I miss Boobs, funny, I don't EVER remember someone shitting on him, or telling me that he was shady, it only goes one direction...

The really strange thing that I just don't have a good explanation for is how badly he appears to want to be seen as consistent, dispassionate and fair. Someone else might just have been honest and said "my sight [site], my rules- freedom of speech ends when I say it does" which would, of course, be more respectable .

Edit: Spelling