its more the censorship thats getting to people, when half the historical lab animals die from long term effects thats not "like any other medicine" there is sooooo much graft, and corruption surround this so called "Trust the Science"
I do agree with you about the censorship though. Good ideas aren't afraid to be challenged but when those challenges are presented with nonevidence riddled in fallacy they are easily dismissed.
I trust the experts of the discipline. I have two degrees in Natural Science and Physics so I won't argue the point with virologists and pathologists. Just like people who think the earth is flat and deny gravity probably shouldn't argue with me.
Isn't it possible that maybe, just maybe, that this vaccine is intended to do good? That maybe just maybe the anti establish science crowd are dead wrong? That maybe just because the government said it doesn't mean it's inheritly bad? That maybe "they" who ever they are, don't have a secret plan ?
look at all the alternate therapise like HCQ Ivermectin, even natural immunity is being ignored. this isnt science, they sideline life saving drugs because they cant make money off them due to how old they are. they are tried and tested and would immediately end EUA for all the vaccines
See I don't buy the money argument when many pharmaceutical companies stopped doing vaccine R&D because of how low the reward was and when most vaccines including this one are free. And vaccine is a prevention HQC if it works is a treatment. So you can't rely compare the two
(post is archived)