I trust the experts of the discipline. I have two degrees in Natural Science and Physics so I won't argue the point with virologists and pathologists. Just like people who think the earth is flat and deny gravity probably shouldn't argue with me.
Isn't it possible that maybe, just maybe, that this vaccine is intended to do good? That maybe just maybe the anti establish science crowd are dead wrong? That maybe just because the government said it doesn't mean it's inheritly bad? That maybe "they" who ever they are, don't have a secret plan ?
look at all the alternate therapise like HCQ Ivermectin, even natural immunity is being ignored. this isnt science, they sideline life saving drugs because they cant make money off them due to how old they are. they are tried and tested and would immediately end EUA for all the vaccines
See I don't buy the money argument when many pharmaceutical companies stopped doing vaccine R&D because of how low the reward was and when most vaccines including this one are free. And vaccine is a prevention HQC if it works is a treatment. So you can't rely compare the two
one the vaccine isnt prevention in the initial FDA filing it only prevents symptoms, also if there are effective treatments EUA gets removed. moderna had never taken a product to market before and suddenly it has this billion dollar syrum that hasnt solved any of the technical problems mRNA inherently has Eg ADE. the value of the company would flatline if their only product ever take to market is removed. also HCQ is most effective as a prophylactic when paired with zinc and azythromisen, so it actually is a preventative medicine and not just a treatment once you have gotten covid
Literally everything you say is wrong. More pharama companies have invented more vaccines historically and at a faster rate. The limiting factor for pharama is lobbying governments to mandate vaccinations. Its pure profit. Pharam requires a captured consumer patient base. Zero liability is a bonus. The Covid Vax is not free. You cant really be that retarded at 31 years old with two college degrees (from UT?). The vax is $20 per shot domestic and $12 foriegn based on leaked confidential contracts outside of US. The vax has less than 40% efficacy in July. So, no, the vax is not preventative and would never recieve FDA approval in the future had the FDA not drastically lowered requirements this week. Hydroxchloriquin can be a treatment but is also a prophylactic. The NIH intentionally spent ZERO dollars of its billion dollar budget to study HQC because if HQC, Ivermectin, Zinc etc demonstrated efficacy then the experimental vaccine could not recieve EUA. Is it worth my time educating a scared 30 year old? Nope, above is for others reading this. Your genes dont belong in my pool. Hopefully your ignorant decisions will remove them.
one are free.
THE FEDS ARE BUYING IT!
Every government in the WORLD is buying it.
The shot isn't free, the company is paid for each one.
most vaccines including this one are free
You really are a special sort of stupid.
(post is archived)