As my manger was stating, development work is 25% development, and 75% coordinating with others. On one hand i can understand this to a certain extent, but apparently the requirements for approval are set by QA who doesnt really exist. So i have to reach out to QA to set the expectations of the feature im working, since they are not really written in the feature itself. And every time me and this other dude ask for a testing framework or the test samples used, they are viscerally denied, making it impossible to figure out why something is failing in the first place.
As my manger was stating, development work is 25% development, and 75% coordinating with others. On one hand i can understand this to a certain extent, but apparently the requirements for approval are set by QA who doesnt really exist. So i have to reach out to QA to set the expectations of the feature im working, since they are not really written in the feature itself. And every time me and this other dude ask for a testing framework or the test samples used, they are viscerally denied, making it impossible to figure out why something is failing in the first place.
They make 500 Mill, but don't have devops? How does that make sense. You should be able to spin-up a test env in like 2 seconds with a proper CI/CD pipeline.
They make 500 Mill, but don't have devops? How does that make sense. You should be able to spin-up a test env in like 2 seconds with a proper CI/CD pipeline.
(post is archived)