WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

675

So far all of Ruqqus, Saidit and rdrama ban users that post photos of metzitzah b'peh claiming it to be CP, when this practice is actually legal in most if not every country, and photos of it are allowed to be hosted and shared on every normie site (e.g. google, imgur, reddit, twitter, facebook).

Plus normally people post photos of it just to show how nasty Jews and / or circumcision is, mainly though just showing people how nasty Jews are.

Personally I am a full mens rights activist and used to regulary oppose infant circumcision on Reddit.

I was hugely surprised that I started getting banned, and saw others (JosephGoebbels) get banned just for sharing and trying to raise awareness of this still actually 100% legal practice.

For those of you who don't know what metzitzah b'peh is and are too lazy to google it, it is sucking the blood out out of a penis after circumcision and is an ancient tradition, long considered a cultural right and practice in Jewish circumcision.

Obviously I'm not going to post pictures of it because I dont want to be fucked up by admins on another site, even though I could already freely post it on Reddit or any such normie site.

Seriously just why the fuck are all these other 'free speech' sites even more restrictive than Crappit / Jewbook and Twatter?

So far all of Ruqqus, Saidit and rdrama ban users that post photos of metzitzah b'peh claiming it to be CP, when this practice is actually legal in most if not every country, and photos of it are allowed to be hosted and shared on every normie site (e.g. google, imgur, reddit, twitter, facebook). Plus normally people post photos of it just to show how nasty Jews and / or circumcision is, mainly though just showing people how nasty Jews are. Personally I am a full mens rights activist and used to regulary oppose infant circumcision on Reddit. I was hugely surprised that I started getting banned, and saw others (JosephGoebbels) get banned just for sharing and trying to raise awareness of this still actually 100% legal practice. For those of you who don't know what metzitzah b'peh is and are too lazy to google it, it is sucking the blood out out of a penis after circumcision and is an ancient tradition, long considered a cultural right and practice in Jewish circumcision. Obviously I'm not going to post pictures of it because I dont want to be fucked up by admins on another site, even though I could already freely post it on Reddit or any such normie site. Seriously just why the fuck are all these other 'free speech' sites even more restrictive than Crappit / Jewbook and Twatter?

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

We do. The photographs are necessary to educate people that have no idea about it and to try and advocate for getting it banned.

If you can't show people how disgusting this is, then what's the point? The images of it are not illegal and can be found on most major news sites that host articles about it.

[–] 5 pts

The images of it are not illegal and can be found on most news sites that host articles about it.

In theory they aren't illegal but in practice they could get the site shut down. I'm sure you've noticed by now that laws are not enforced evenly or fairly.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

If the images were already hosted by google, then google isn't going to take a site down for re linking them.

They have strict CP scanning algorithms already, if pics of this counted then they wouldn't exist on google image searches already and in such quantity.

What do you do when a person genuinely, and rightfully doesn't know that a few fringe sites are going to accuse them of posting CP for kike circumcision pics?

[–] 1 pt

Goolag has already been caught showing child porn in its Related Images area, and searching for online handles of CP distributors brings up their images.

Appeal to authority won't work here. Don't post images.

[–] 2 pts

No naked kids. End of story.

[–] 1 pt

The kids aren't naked, the pics just have a Rabbi carrying out millennia old post circumcision 'wound cleaning'.

How can anyone advocate banning this practice without showing it? Most people refuse to actually believe it happens unless they see the photos.

[–] 1 pt

I agree that there should be a repository of material for people to view of criminal acts.

I do abhor the censorship of torture and snuff films, in particular, because people need to seeit to know it is real.

So I do agree with you that it should be available to view.

That being said, I don't need to see it online in threads on Poal.

I'm happy there is a place we can discuss politics freely even in spite of the many self hating Mossad looking to push race baiting and faux white extremism.