But who is deciding that Jewish circumcision is sexually explicit? Because no jurisdiction is doing anything to stop it.
All images, videos or depictions of any kind that show sexually explicit or suggestive content involving children (whether virtual or real) is strictly prohibited.
What is it that you don't understand in that ToS part?
Circumcision pics are neither explicit or suggestive, they are simply an unnecessary 'medical' procedure that still gets carried out.
People post memes of this freely all over reddit / imgur / facebook / twitter, to the point that I don't get why only these fringe 'free speech' sites ban it.
The images are found in normal news articles from New York Times to Daily Mail, if they were explicit or suggestive then that absolutely wouldn't be allowed.
The only places banning these images are curiously 'free speech' websites.
All images, videos or depictions of any kind that show sexually explicit or suggestive content involving children (whether virtual or real) is strictly prohibited.
What is it that you don't understand in that ToS part?
The penis itself is what is considered explicit. You're talking about adults putting their mouths on child penises. No matter the context, images won't be allowed.
THERES NO PENIS IN ANY OF THE PICS FFS I'M GOING TO DM IT TO YOU
It's an legal act.
If you want to hide the act then publicize the act till enough awareness is raised to make it illegal
I'm not clear on your point.
(post is archived)