Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

909

So far all of Ruqqus, Saidit and rdrama ban users that post photos of metzitzah b'peh claiming it to be CP, when this practice is actually legal in most if not every country, and photos of it are allowed to be hosted and shared on every normie site (e.g. google, imgur, reddit, twitter, facebook).

Plus normally people post photos of it just to show how nasty Jews and / or circumcision is, mainly though just showing people how nasty Jews are.

Personally I am a full mens rights activist and used to regulary oppose infant circumcision on Reddit.

I was hugely surprised that I started getting banned, and saw others (JosephGoebbels) get banned just for sharing and trying to raise awareness of this still actually 100% legal practice.

For those of you who don't know what metzitzah b'peh is and are too lazy to google it, it is sucking the blood out out of a penis after circumcision and is an ancient tradition, long considered a cultural right and practice in Jewish circumcision.

Obviously I'm not going to post pictures of it because I dont want to be fucked up by admins on another site, even though I could already freely post it on Reddit or any such normie site.

Seriously just why the fuck are all these other 'free speech' sites even more restrictive than Crappit / Jewbook and Twatter?

So far all of Ruqqus, Saidit and rdrama ban users that post photos of metzitzah b'peh claiming it to be CP, when this practice is actually legal in most if not every country, and photos of it are allowed to be hosted and shared on every normie site (e.g. google, imgur, reddit, twitter, facebook). Plus normally people post photos of it just to show how nasty Jews and / or circumcision is, mainly though just showing people how nasty Jews are. Personally I am a full mens rights activist and used to regulary oppose infant circumcision on Reddit. I was hugely surprised that I started getting banned, and saw others (JosephGoebbels) get banned just for sharing and trying to raise awareness of this still actually 100% legal practice. For those of you who don't know what metzitzah b'peh is and are too lazy to google it, it is sucking the blood out out of a penis after circumcision and is an ancient tradition, long considered a cultural right and practice in Jewish circumcision. Obviously I'm not going to post pictures of it because I dont want to be fucked up by admins on another site, even though I could already freely post it on Reddit or any such normie site. Seriously just why the fuck are all these other 'free speech' sites even more restrictive than Crappit / Jewbook and Twatter?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (55).
[–] [Sticky] • 1 pt

All images, videos or depictions of any kind that show sexually explicit or suggestive content involving children (whether virtual or real) is strictly prohibited.

https://poal.co/tos

[–] • 2 pts

Pedos always out themselves with all the kvetching. You should sticky the no pedo rule and watch them reeee

[–] • 1 pt

Technically not sexual or suggestive. It's a "medical procedure".

Banning images of it would suggest the rabbi gets off to sucking little boy penis, and that's antisemitic. I will have my lawyer contact you about the 50,000$ in libel you owe me.

[–] • 0 pt

But who is deciding that Jewish circumcision is sexually explicit? Because no jurisdiction is doing anything to stop it.

[–] • 1 pt

All images, videos or depictions of any kind that show sexually explicit or suggestive content involving children (whether virtual or real) is strictly prohibited.

https://poal.co/tos

What is it that you don't understand in that ToS part?

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Circumcision pics are neither explicit or suggestive, they are simply an unnecessary 'medical' procedure that still gets carried out.

People post memes of this freely all over reddit / imgur / facebook / twitter, to the point that I don't get why only these fringe 'free speech' sites ban it.

The images are found in normal news articles from New York Times to Daily Mail, if they were explicit or suggestive then that absolutely wouldn't be allowed.

The only places banning these images are curiously 'free speech' websites.

[–] • 0 pt

The penis itself is what is considered explicit. You're talking about adults putting their mouths on child penises. No matter the context, images won't be allowed.

[–] • 0 pt

THERES NO PENIS IN ANY OF THE PICS FFS I'M GOING TO DM IT TO YOU

[–] • 0 pt

It's an legal act.

If you want to hide the act then publicize the act till enough awareness is raised to make it illegal

[–] • 0 pt

For context see my discussion of this topic here as well from post #189:

https://www.overclockers.co.uk/forums/threads/apple-to-scan-images-for-child-abuse.18934914/page-10

People on any normal website cannot even understand why these 'free speech' sites are banning circumcision pics.

[–] • 0 pt

I don't give a damn that other places want to promote pedophilia especially when done by jews.

If you can't understand that, you are in the wrong place.

[–] • 0 pt

The irony.

Perfectly legal act that is in fact defended.

But cannot post pictures of the legal event as it shows illegal acts upon a minor

[–] • -1 pt

No one is promoting it which is the point, people make memes of it to insult Jews and call the practice out in an effort to try and get it stopped. No one is defending it.

It gets posted as anti jewish stuff saying 'this is bad and needs to be banned'.